We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 184

First Circuit: no coverage under claims made and reported policy if insured fails to report claim within policy period
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 29 2009

The First Circuit recently held that an insured was not entitled to coverage under a Professional Liability claims made and reported policy where the claim is not both made against the insured and reported to the insurer within the policy period


D.C. Circuit remands Rule 151A to the SEC
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 29 2009

This updates our January 28, 2009 posting


Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reverses summary judgment and holds against insurer in bad faith action related to uninsured motorist claim
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • August 27 2009

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently reversed an award of summary judgment that had been in favor of an insurer in a bad faith action regarding an uninsured motorist claim, and found against the insurer


California Supreme Court: assault committed in self-defense is not an “accident"
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • October 29 2009

The California Supreme Court recently held that an assault and battery allegedly committed in self-defense was not an "accident" and therefore did not meet a CGL policy’s definition of a covered "occurrence."


Louisiana insureds petition the U.S. Supreme Court to review a Fifth Circuit decision vacating that portion of Katrina-related judgment that awarded penalties, damages and attorneys’ fees based on an insurer's alleged bad faith
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • October 26 2009

On July 21, 2009, Judy and Michael Kodrin filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the Supreme Court to review a Fifth Circuit decision vacating that portion of a Katrina-related judgment that awarded them penalties, damages and attorneys’ fees based on their homeowners insurer’s alleged bad faith


New Jersey appellate court affirms denial of coverage for attorneys' failure to disclose potential malpractice claim
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • December 28 2010

The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, recently affirmed a trial court's decision to deny coverage to an attorney and his law firm who had been sued in an underlying malpractice action


Connecticut district court grants summary judgment to insurer on bad faith claim
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • December 28 2010

The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut recently granted a property insurer's motion for summary judgment on a claim that the insurer acted in bad faith when it denied coverage to its insured for damage to the basement walls in the insured's home


Second Circuit finds that service of suit provision in treaties unambiguously waived reinsurer's right of removal
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • January 3 2011

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently affirmed a district court decision that remanded to state court a lawsuit asserted by the Liquidator of Midland Insurance Company against its reinsurer, Dunav Re, finding that the Service of Suit clause in the reinsurance treaties at issue unambiguously waived Dunav Re's right to remove the dispute to federal court


Federal court orders insurer to produce reinsurance information, despite acknowledging split among courts on the issue
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • January 11 2011

Suffolk Federal Credit Union ("SFCU") brought an action against Cumis Insurance Society to recover certain losses arising under a fidelity bond


Massachusetts Appeals Court holds that bad faith statute applies to captive insurers
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • December 10 2010

The Massachusetts Appeals Court recently ruled that the state's statute governing insurance companies' claims settlement practices applies to captive insurers