We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 420

Federal court finds that fraud claim is not arbitrable
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • August 4 2010

In a decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, AXA Versicherung AG v. New Hampshire Ins. Co., 05 Civ. 10180 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. 2010), the court held that certain fraud claims were not a matter of contract interpretation and, therefore, not arbitrable under a provision in a facultative reinsurance agreement that provided for arbitration of disputes “arising out of the interpretation of this agreement.”


NY lower court holds that Insurance Law 3420(a) applies to lawyer’s claims-made malpractice policy
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • November 19 2009

The New York Supreme Court, Erie County, recently held that a lawyers’ professional liability policy constitutes a "policy or contract insuring against liability for injury to person" within the meaning of Insurance Law 3420(a)(3)-(4


The Florida Office of Insurance Regulation enters cooperation agreement with the United Kingdom’s financial regulator
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 24 2009

On Tuesday, July 21, 2009, the head of the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation ("FLOIR"), Commissioner Kevin McCarty, announced the signing of a memorandum of understanding ("MoU") with the United Kingdom Financial Services Authority ("FSA"), the United Kingdom’s regulator responsible for regulatory oversight of the insurance, banking and securities markets


Presentation by Eithne McCarthy - the new Insurance Block Exemption Regulation
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • April 22 2010

Eithne McCarthy, from the Financial Services Unit of the European Commission's Competition Directorate General (DG Comp), made a presentation on the new Insurance Block Exemption Regulation (BER) to the Law Society's Competition Section on 13 April 2010


First Circuit upholds decision to deny insurer recoupment of deductibles following class action settlement
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • August 31 2009

The First Circuit recently affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Maine to deny American National Fire Insurance Company’s ("ANFIC") plea for recoupment of a settlement payment made by ANFIC to York County Jail


Connecticut Superior Court held that insurer was not required to provide underinsured motorist coverage for insured’s family member
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • February 5 2010

A Connecticut Superior Court recently awarded summary judgment in favor of an insurer on the basis that an insured’s family member who resides in the insured’s household is not entitled to underinsured motorist benefits if they are similarly not entitled to liability coverage under the family member’s policy


Ambac Financial Group Inc. files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • November 10 2010

Ambac Financial Group Inc., parent of the troubled Wisconsin-domiciled bond insurer Ambac Assurance Corp., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy relief on November 8, 2010


Court finds coverage excluded for shooting by security guard
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • September 1 2010

A California Appeals Court recently held that a wrongful death action against a security guard who shot a man while on duty was excluded under an "assault and battery" exclusion, even if the security guard acted in self-defense


Wisconsin court: “negligent misrepresentation” claims by molestation victims against archdiocese are not covered under CGL policy
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • December 28 2010

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals recently ruled that "negligent misrepresentation" claims against the Archdiocese of Milwaukee arising from alleged molestation by priests are not covered under the Archdiocese's CGL policy


Connecticut District Court: insurer's default judgment does not necessarily preclude litigation in subrogation action
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 12 2010

A Connecticut District Court recently held that plaintiffs, who brought a subrogation action to recover a judgment entered in their favor in an underlying legal malpractice action against their attorneys, were entitled to litigate coverage issues even though the attorneys' insurer obtained a default judgment against the attorneys in a separate coverage action