We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 201

Arizona court finds coverage under D&O policy
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • April 11 2011

The eight-year lawsuit captioned Wojtunik v. Kealy, pending in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, has resulted in yet another decision of interest concerning directors and officers coverage


Eighth Circuit holds pollution exclusion applicable to sealant fumes
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • May 14 2014

In its recent decision in United Fire & Cas. Co. v. Titan Contrs. Serv., 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8879 (8th Cir. May 13, 2014), the United States Court


Oklahoma court holds no coverage for medical malpractice claim
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • February 1 2013

In its recent decision in Admiral Ins. Co. v. Thomas, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10754 (W.D. Ok. Jan. 28, 2013), the United States District for the


Ninth Circuit holds extrinsic facts triggered duty to defend
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • March 7 2014

In its recent decision in Burlington Ins. Co. v. CHWC, Inc., 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3941 (9th Cir. Mar. 3, 2014), the United States Court of Appeals


Second Circuit holds pollution liability policy not triggered
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • June 28 2013

In its recent decision in Colonial Oil Indus. V. Indian Harbor Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 12946 (2d Cir. June 25, 2013), the United States Court


New York’s highest court vacates its decision in K2
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • February 18 2014

In its February 18, 2014 decision in K2 Investment Group, LLP v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins. Co., New York's Court of Appeals - New York's


Rhode Island Supreme Court invalidates healthcare provider’s right to self-insure
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • January 22 2013

In its recent decision in Peloquin v. Haven Health Ctr. Of Greenville, 2013 R.I. LEXIS 9 (R.I. Jan. 14, 2013), the Supreme Court of Rhode Island had


Insured’s settlement without consent bars coverage under OCIP
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • December 18 2013

In its recent decision in PeriniTompkins Joint Venture v. Ace Am. Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 24865 (4th Cir. Dec. 16, 2013), the United States


New York’s highest court holds limitation on suit provision unreasonable
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • February 17 2014

In its recent decision in Executive Plaza, LLC v. Peerless Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 898, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 165 (N.Y. Feb. 13, 2014), the Court of


Third Circuit holds interrelated claims provision is an exclusion to coverage
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • February 7 2014

In its recent decision in Borough of Moosic v. Darwin National Assurance Co., 2014 U.S. Ap. LEXIS 2118 (3d Cir. Feb. 4, 2014), the United States