We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 201

Vermont Supreme Court rejects joint and several liability theory
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • September 18 2011

In its recent decision Bradford Oil Company, Inc. v. Stonington Ins. Co., 2011 Vt. LEXIS 102 (Vt. Sept. 11, 2011), the Supreme Court of Vermont had occasion to revisit the issue of whether a time-on-the-risk allocation methodology should apply to pollution condition that occurred over a period of several decades


Indiana Supreme Court addresses coverage by estoppel
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • June 27 2011

It is the law in many jurisdictions that an insurer’s actions, or lack thereof, can result in a matter qualifying for coverage notwithstanding the otherwise clear application of a coverage defense


Third Circuit Court of Appeals addresses reformation of insurance policy
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • August 5 2011

In Illinois National Ins. Co. v. Wyndham Worldwide Operations, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15894 (3d Cir. Aug. 3, 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit had occasion to consider whether the doctrine of mutual mistake allows for reformation of an insurance policy against a party that was not part of the insurance procurement process


California court holds no coverage for Prop 65 case
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • June 15 2011

California’s Proposition 65 of the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1965, 25249.5 et seq., is a “remedial statute” which, among other things, requires “businesses to warn individuals about carcinogens and reproductive toxins to which they may be exposed through commercial transactions, employment, and the environment.” Consumer Cause, Inc. v. SmileCare, 91 Cal.App.4th 454 (Cal.App. 2001


Missouri court addresses owned property exclusion
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • January 25 2012

In its recent decision in Clarinet v. Essex Ins. Co., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7300 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 23, 2012), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri had occasion to consider whether a general liability policy afforded coverage for an insured’s obligation to stabilize and later demolish its own building so as to prevent damage to third-party property


7th Circuit addresses insured vs. insured exclusion
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • July 3 2012

In its recent decision in Miller v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13298 (7th Cir. June 29, 2012), the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, addressing Illinois law, had occasion to consider the application of an insured vs. insured exclusion in a D&O policy


First Circuit holds prior knowledge exclusion applicable
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • October 29 2013

In its recent decision in Clark School for Creative Learning, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 21568 (1st Cir. Oct. 23


Oklahoma court addresses time element pollution exclusion
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • April 3 2013

In its recent decision in Colony Insurance Company v. Bear Products, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43716 (E.D. Okl. Mar. 26, 2013), the United States


Kentucky court holds insurer established diversity jurisdiction
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • December 12 2013

In its recent decision in Capitol Specialty Ins. Corp. v. IKO, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167933 (E.D. Ky. Nov. 26, 2013), the United States


Florida court allows rescission of a professional liability policy
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • December 12 2013

In its recent decision in Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Diamond Title of Sarasota, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170981 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 4, 2013), the