We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 201

Third Circuit Court of Appeals addresses reformation of insurance policy
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • August 5 2011

In Illinois National Ins. Co. v. Wyndham Worldwide Operations, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15894 (3d Cir. Aug. 3, 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit had occasion to consider whether the doctrine of mutual mistake allows for reformation of an insurance policy against a party that was not part of the insurance procurement process


Texas court addresses business risk exclusion
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • April 26 2011

Coverage litigation concerning the so-called "business risk" exclusions in a general liability policy often times requires a very detailed inquiry into the scope of the insured's work


New York court holds negligent supervision claim triggers defense
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • March 26 2012

In its recent decision in Am. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Sec. Income Planners & Co., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39444 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 22, 2012), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York had occasion to consider exclusions in a professional liability applicable to commingling andor conversion of client funds, and whether these exclusions applied to the named insured’s negligent failure to prevent an employee from committing such conduct


Illinois court addresses coverage for trade dress infringement
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • May 23 2011

In its recent decision Priceless Clothing Co. v. Travelers Casualty Ins. Co. of America, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53833 (N.D.Ill. May 19, 2011), the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois had occasion to consider the scope of advertising injury coverage afforded under a general liability policy


Oklahoma court holds no coverage for medical malpractice claim
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • February 1 2013

In its recent decision in Admiral Ins. Co. v. Thomas, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10754 (W.D. Ok. Jan. 28, 2013), the United States District for the


New York court allows disgorgement coverage action to proceed
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • June 18 2013

In its recent decision in J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. v. Vigilant Ins. Co., 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 1465 (NY June 11, 2013), New York's Court of Appeals -


New York’s highest court holds limitation on suit provision unreasonable
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • February 17 2014

In its recent decision in Executive Plaza, LLC v. Peerless Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 898, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 165 (N.Y. Feb. 13, 2014), the Court of


Eighth Circuit affirms disclaimer based on patient bodily injury exclusion
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • April 11 2014

In its recent decision in Volk v. Ace Am. Ins. Co., 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 6570 (8th Cir. Apr. 10, 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the


Insured’s settlement without consent bars coverage under OCIP
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • December 18 2013

In its recent decision in PeriniTompkins Joint Venture v. Ace Am. Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 24865 (4th Cir. Dec. 16, 2013), the United States


Maryland court considers prejudice in claims made and reported policy
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2013

In its recent decision in McDowell Bldg. V. Zurich Am. Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133166 (D. Md. Sept. 17, 2013), the United States District