We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 201

Florida court addresses breach of duty to cooperate
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • May 25 2011

In its recent decision titled Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Diamond Title of Sarasota, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52831 (M.D.Fla. May 17, 2011), the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida had occasion to consider the duties imposed on an insured pursuant to a policy’s cooperation clause


Pennsylvania court considers designated premises or project limitation
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • May 25 2012

In its recent decision in Western Heritage Ins. Co. v. Darrah, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71768 (M.D. Pa. May 23, 2012), the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania had occasion to reconsider the effect of a designated premises or project limitation endorsement


Missouri court addresses owned property exclusion
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • January 25 2012

In its recent decision in Clarinet v. Essex Ins. Co., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7300 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 23, 2012), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri had occasion to consider whether a general liability policy afforded coverage for an insured’s obligation to stabilize and later demolish its own building so as to prevent damage to third-party property


7th Circuit holds no coverage for restitution claim under D&O policy
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • April 13 2012

In its recent decision in Ryerson Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co., 2102 U.S. App. LEXIS 7372 (Apr. 12, 2012), the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, applying Illinois law, had occasion to consider whether an underlying suit seeking rescission of a fraudulent transaction triggered coverage under a directors and officers liability policy


Oklahoma Court holds failure to warn not a covered professional service
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • March 7 2013

In its recent decision in Hanover Am. Ins. Co. v. Saul, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29739 (W.D. Okl. Mar. 5, 2013), the United States District Court for


Montana court addresses business risk exclusions
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • February 12 2013

In its recent decision in Lukes v. Mid-Continent Cas. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17979 (D. Mont. Feb. 11, 2013), the United States District Court for


Massachusetts court holds fee dispute not covered under E&O policy
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • April 7 2011

The recent decision by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Clermont v. Continental Casualty Co., 2011 U.S Dist. LEXIS 32850 (D.Mass. Mar. 29, 2011) provides an interesting and illustrative study of the limits of coverage under a lawyer’s malpractice policy, in particular, what types of disputes arise out of an attorney’s “professional services.”


Oklahoma court addresses time element pollution exclusion
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • April 3 2013

In its recent decision in Colony Insurance Company v. Bear Products, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43716 (E.D. Okl. Mar. 26, 2013), the United States


New Jersey Federal Court expands estoppel rule to inter-insurer disputes
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • April 15 2011

In the recently decided case captioned Mazzoli v. Marina District Development Co., LLC, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39116 (D.N.J. Apr. 11, 2011), the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey had occasion to consider New Jersey’s so-called “Eggleston rule” in the context of an inter-insurer dispute


Wisconsin court holds gas line explosion not covered under CPL policy
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • March 18 2014

In its recent decision in Acuity v. Chartis Specialty Ins. Co., 2014 Wisc. App. LEXIS 201 (Wisc. App. Mar. 12, 2014), the Court of Appeals for