We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 201

Massachusetts court holds fee dispute not covered under E&O policy
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • April 7 2011

The recent decision by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Clermont v. Continental Casualty Co., 2011 U.S Dist. LEXIS 32850 (D.Mass. Mar. 29, 2011) provides an interesting and illustrative study of the limits of coverage under a lawyer’s malpractice policy, in particular, what types of disputes arise out of an attorney’s “professional services.”


Oklahoma Court holds failure to warn not a covered professional service
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • March 7 2013

In its recent decision in Hanover Am. Ins. Co. v. Saul, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29739 (W.D. Okl. Mar. 5, 2013), the United States District Court for


California court holds no coverage for Prop 65 case
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • June 15 2011

California’s Proposition 65 of the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1965, 25249.5 et seq., is a “remedial statute” which, among other things, requires “businesses to warn individuals about carcinogens and reproductive toxins to which they may be exposed through commercial transactions, employment, and the environment.” Consumer Cause, Inc. v. SmileCare, 91 Cal.App.4th 454 (Cal.App. 2001


5th Circuit holds no coverage for trucking accident
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • February 26 2013

In its recent decision in Canal Indem. Co. v. Rapid Logistics, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3772 (5th Cir. Feb. 22, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals


Eighth Circuit affirms disclaimer based on patient bodily injury exclusion
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • April 11 2014

In its recent decision in Volk v. Ace Am. Ins. Co., 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 6570 (8th Cir. Apr. 10, 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the


Connecticut court holds sexual molestation limitation applicable
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • May 30 2013

In its recent decision in Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Briggs, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74885 (D. Conn. May 29, 2013), the United States


New York court holds incidents of sexual molestation separate occurrences
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • May 9 2013

In its recent decision in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 2013 NY Slip Op 3264 (N.Y. May 7


New York’s highest court vacates its decision in K2
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • February 18 2014

In its February 18, 2014 decision in K2 Investment Group, LLP v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins. Co., New York's Court of Appeals - New York's


New York court holds professional services exclusion applicable
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • April 3 2013

In its recent decision in David Lerner Assocs. V. Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46333 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2013), the United


Oklahoma court addresses time element pollution exclusion
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • April 3 2013

In its recent decision in Colony Insurance Company v. Bear Products, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43716 (E.D. Okl. Mar. 26, 2013), the United States