We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 201

Pennsylvania court considers designated premises or project limitation
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • May 25 2012

In its recent decision in Western Heritage Ins. Co. v. Darrah, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71768 (M.D. Pa. May 23, 2012), the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania had occasion to reconsider the effect of a designated premises or project limitation endorsement


Nevada court addresses insurer’s need for interpleader
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • March 16 2012

One of the more perplexing issues faced by insurers is how to handle multiple claims, or a claim involving multiple insureds, when there are insufficient policy limits available to pay all loss


Ninth Circuit affirms rescission of professional liability policy
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • September 25 2012

In its recent decision in Tudor Ins. Co. v. Hellickson Real Estate, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19904 (9th Cir. Sept. 21, 2012), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, applying Washington law, examined whether an insurer was entitled to rescission of a professional liability policy based on the insured’s failure to have disclosed several pending administrative complaints in the policy application


Prior litigation exclusion upheld by Washington court
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • March 30 2011

Application of "pending or prior litigation" exclusions are generally fact-intensive inquiries that have generated a significant amount of litigation


Massachusetts court holds fee dispute not covered under E&O policy
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • April 7 2011

The recent decision by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Clermont v. Continental Casualty Co., 2011 U.S Dist. LEXIS 32850 (D.Mass. Mar. 29, 2011) provides an interesting and illustrative study of the limits of coverage under a lawyer’s malpractice policy, in particular, what types of disputes arise out of an attorney’s “professional services.”


Illinois court addresses coverage for trade dress infringement
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • May 23 2011

In its recent decision Priceless Clothing Co. v. Travelers Casualty Ins. Co. of America, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53833 (N.D.Ill. May 19, 2011), the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois had occasion to consider the scope of advertising injury coverage afforded under a general liability policy


Connecticut federal court split on recoupment of defense costs
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • August 17 2011

In Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. Mortensen, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77356 (D. Conn. July 18, 2011), the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut affirmed its earlier decision that an insurer was not entitled to recoupment of defense costs despite receiving an adjudication that it had no duty to defend


Oklahoma Court holds failure to warn not a covered professional service
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • March 7 2013

In its recent decision in Hanover Am. Ins. Co. v. Saul, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29739 (W.D. Okl. Mar. 5, 2013), the United States District Court for


Maryland court considers prejudice in claims made and reported policy
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2013

In its recent decision in McDowell Bldg. V. Zurich Am. Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133166 (D. Md. Sept. 17, 2013), the United States District


New York court allows disgorgement coverage action to proceed
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • June 18 2013

In its recent decision in J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. v. Vigilant Ins. Co., 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 1465 (NY June 11, 2013), New York's Court of Appeals -