We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 286

California court refuses to extend coverage for fire intentionally set by child under homeowner’s policy
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • January 27 2010

Recently, a California Appeals Court denied coverage under a homeowner's policy for damages caused by a fire intentionally set by the insureds' son


NY lower court holds that Insurance Law 3420(a) applies to lawyer’s claims-made malpractice policy
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • November 19 2009

The New York Supreme Court, Erie County, recently held that a lawyers’ professional liability policy constitutes a "policy or contract insuring against liability for injury to person" within the meaning of Insurance Law 3420(a)(3)-(4


Eleventh Circuit upholds that D&O policy does not provide coverage for claims arising out of property damage under Florida law
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2010

In an unpublished opinion, the Eleventh Circuit recently affirmed the trial court's decision that a D&O policy does not provide coverage for third-party property damage claims


NY court: insured may recover consequential damages absent insurer bad faith
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • December 23 2009

On December 15, 2009, New York's Appellate Division for the First Department held that an insured need not allege or prove that its insurer acted in bad faith in order to recover consequential damages stemming from the insurer's breach of the policy


Massachusetts health insurers sue over rejected rate increases
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • April 6 2010

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts and the Massachusetts Association of Health Plans have sued the Massachusetts Division of Insurance (DOI) after the DOI's decision last week to reject most proposed rate increases for small businesses for the current calendar quarter


Georgia Supreme Court holds insurer not entitled to safe harbor jury instruction where it conditioned tender of policy limits
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • January 6 2010

The Georgia Supreme Court recently remanded a case alleging an insurer's bad-faith failure to settle based upon the fact that the trial court improperly instructed the jury that where a claimant's demand is conditioned upon the response of another insurance company, the insurer's offer of its policy limits fulfills its duty to its insured


Second Circuit: distinguishing between policy definitions subject to NY Insurance Law 3420(d)(2)’s timely disclaimer requirement as an exclusion and those that are not
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 16 2010

In a decision issued on February 1, 2010, the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit confirmed that under New York law some policy provisions, although placed outside of the policy's "Exclusions" section, may nonetheless be considered an exclusion and, therefore, subject to the timely disclaimer and denial requirement of NY Insurance Law 3420(d)(2


U.S. lawsuits based upon foreign toxic tort liability: a growing threat?
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 14 2010

In July 2009 in New Castle County in the State of Delaware, three separate plaintiffs filed civil suits against E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Inc. (“DuPont”) alleging that their work at a DuPont textile plant in Mercedes, Argentina from 1961 to 2002 caused them to be exposed to and inhale asbestos fibers


New York State Court denies motion to compel discovery of reinsurance and reserve information
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 29 2010

In Mt. McKinley Ins. Co. v. Corning Inc., 2010 NY Slip Op 20235 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. June 14, 2010), an insured (“Corning”) moved to compel discovery of reinsurance and reserve information from its insurers, arguing that this information was relevant, material and necessary to its coverage claim


D&O insurers seek relief from automatic stay in order to assert coverage defense counterclaims against investment firm insureds
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • August 7 2009

Two D&O insurers have asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota to lift an automatic stay in a bankruptcy proceeding pending against their insureds so that the insurers can pursue their coverage defenses as counterclaims against the insureds in a pending declaratory judgment action