We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,602

What’s next for 2015
  • O'Melveny & Myers LLP
  • USA
  • March 12 2015

Over the past several years, data security breaches have hit a broad array of industries -retail, financial, entertainment, health care. Universities


What does the Supreme Court ruling in Alice v. CLS mean to a software entrepreneur?
  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • USA
  • August 15 2014

The Supreme Court’s ruling against broadly claimed software patents in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank leaves many questions on patent eligibility unanswered


Electronic discovery & information governance - tip of the month: e-discovery in patent litigation
  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • USA
  • October 1 2014

The General Counsel of a technology company has received a complaint alleging patent infringement by the company’s highest-grossing product. The


Supreme Court unanimously affirms Federal Circuit CLS Bank decision
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • August 19 2014

The Supreme Court has affirmed the Federal Circuit's decision holding that the method, computer-readable medium and system claims at issue in Alice v


Recent grants in electronic commerce technology group provide evidence that at least “technical inventions” still pass muster under Alice
  • Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner PA
  • USA
  • August 15 2014

In a recent post Dennis Crouch has provided two charts showing the grant rate of patents filed between 2003 and 2010, divided by technology area. See


Judge derides the “pencil-and-paper analysis” for software patents, finds error-correction claims valid
  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
  • USA
  • November 17 2014

On November 3, 2014, Judge Mariana Pfaelzer issued an order in California Inst. of Tech. V. Hughes Commc’ns Inc., No. 2:13-CV-07245-MRP, 2014 WL


Modifying the Innovation Act to selectively target the patent troll problem
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2014

The following is a blog post by Varun Shah, Aruba Network's Director, Intellectual Property full disclosure, I previously represented Aruba


The PTAB rejects Microsoft's attempt to institute an IPR proceeding almost 7 years after being served with a complaint involving the patent-at-issue
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 30 2014

In Microsoft Corporation v. Virnetx Inc., Microsoft filed a petition seeking inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 7,188,180 ("the '180 patent") on


Five things patent trolls don’t want you to know about litigation
  • Thompson Coburn LLP
  • USA
  • September 30 2014

Patent trolls are not all the same. They have different tactics, different areas of expertise, and they can behave in very different ways in


Foreign marketing materials relevant to domestic infringement
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 1 2014

In an appeal of a lower court’s summary judgment of no infringement of four patents, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the