We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 2,482

비자명성(Non-Obviousness)에 의한 거절이유가 2 부족할 때
  • Sughrue Mion PLLC
  • South Korea, USA
  • October 4 2016

미국 특허법에서 35 U.S.C. 103은 특허를 받는 기술이 종래의 기술에 비추어 보았을 때 해당 분야의 통상의 기술을 가진 자에게 자명(obvious)하지 않을 것을 요구합니다. 이것은 세상에 이미 알려진 바와 비교했을 때 너무 “뻔한” 기술한테는 특허라는

The High Court takes the High Road on Patent Eligibility - The Supreme Court refuses to consider patents invalidated under the MayoAlice framework
  • Bracewell LLP
  • USA
  • October 6 2016

The Supreme Court on October 3, 2016, denied certiorari in a number of patent cases, including four cases concerning subject matter eligibility in

USPTO Alice Corp. guidelines provide concrete guidance on abstract ideas
  • Merchant & Gould
  • USA
  • July 28 2014

On June 25, 2014, the USPTO issued a memorandum regarding revised examination instructions as a result of the Supreme Court decision in Alice Corp. v

Patent Owners May Not Sue Customers of Those Who Prevailed in Showing the Accused Products Did Not Infringe, Even Under a New Theory of Infringement
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • March 1 2016

The Supreme Court recently declined to review a June 2015 Federal Circuit ruling in SpeedTrack, Inc. v. Office Depot, Inc., which enforced

Survival of the fittest: Beauregard patent claims after CyberSource
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • March 28 2012

A recent decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit provides new insight into whether Beauregard patent claims are statutory subject matter under 35 USC 101

Apple v. Samsung: after remand from the Federal Circuit, Apple wins preliminary injunction against Samsung
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 5 2012

Last December, the district court in the Northern District of California denied Apple's motion for a preliminary injunction

U.S. Department of Justice and European Commission close antitrust investigations into high-profile patent acquisitions
  • Jones Day
  • European Union, USA
  • February 24 2012

This past week the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice announced that it was closing its investigations of three high-profile acquisitions of substantial patent portfolios, including patents essential to implementing standards in the wireless communications and computer industries

MRCO v. Bandai Shows the Way to Broader Method Claims that Satisfy Alice and Mayo
  • Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • USA
  • October 10 2016

It is said that one should cast a “wide net to catch the big fish.” In patent parlance, the wide net is the claims and the big fish are the

The difficulties dealing with nanotechnology in the world of patentable Technologies
  • Stein IP LLC
  • USA
  • July 23 2014

Among the emerging Technologies that affect our daily functions, nanotechnology is at the forefront of making a huge impact in our society

SanDisk defeats Walker Process Claim
  • Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
  • USA
  • May 6 2016

The District Court for the Northern District of California granted defendant SanDisk’s motion for summary judgment in Giuliano, et al v. SanDisk Corp