We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,181

How to Get Your Law Firm’s Feet Wet with Technology-Assisted Review
  • Xerox Litigation Services
  • USA
  • May 3 2016

Your client wants to start using technology assisted review (TAR) on a new case fantastic! So now what? There’s been a lot of discussion since the

From Ashley Madison to the Panama Papers: Is Hacked Data Fair Game?
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • April 22 2016

We've previously written about the distinctions between hacking credit and other financial data in comparison to hacking private information. The

文書の提出にあたり極秘との指定を過剰に利用した当事者に対して制裁が課された 事例
  • Jenner & Block LLP
  • USA
  • February 5 2016

Procaps S.A. V. Patheon Inc., No. 12-24356 (S.D. Fla. July 20, 2015)において原告は提出した電子的文書 のうち95につき当事者間で合意された保護命令に基づき極秘及び弁護士のみ閲覧可能との

Supreme Court Confirms Improper Jury Instructions Are Not a Bar to Conviction Under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • USA
  • January 26 2016

The U.S. Supreme Court held on January 25, 2016 that an erroneous jury instruction does not result in an acquittal for a defendant who was found

Cybersecurity and Data Breaches: How In-House Counsel Can Engage the Board
  • Association of Corporate Counsel
  • Global, USA
  • January 19 2016

The legal department’s role in protecting a company’s valuable information, and preventing damage to its competitive positioning, stock price, and shareholder value

How the Ethics Rules Influence the Role of Discovery Counsel
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • December 22 2015

This is the second in a three-part series about the critical role of discovery counsel on a successful litigation team. In Part I, we discussed the

Court Sanctions Party That Over-Designated “Highly Confidential” Documents
  • Jenner & Block LLP
  • USA
  • December 15 2015

In Procaps S.A. v. Patheon Inc., No. 12-24356 (S.D. Fla. July 20, 2015), the plaintiff designated 95 of the electronic documents it produced as

Review of the Basic Idea of Document Culling
  • Jackson Lewis PC
  • USA
  • December 10 2015

This is part Twelve of the continuing series on two-filter document culling. (Yes, we are going for a world record on longest law blog series.:

November’s notable cases and events in e-discovey
  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • European Union, USA
  • November 25 2015

This Sidley Update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues: A European Court of Justice (ECJ

Target court rules results of data breach investigation privileged
  • Arnold & Porter LLP
  • USA
  • November 23 2015

On October 23, 2015, the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota upheld Target's attempt to withhold as privileged certain