We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 2,270

International guide to contaminated land 2015
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Brazil, United Kingdom, USA, Venezuela, Vietnam, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, Philippines, Poland, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Kazakhstan, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Peru, France, Germany, Hungary, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt
  • October 21 2015

There is no Commonwealth law that deals directly with contaminated sites, although there are a number of policy documents and guidelines that have


Proposed Rule Adding Vapor Intrusion Component to Hazard Ranking System Will Likely Appear in Federal Register This Month
  • Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP
  • USA
  • February 10 2016

A proposed rule that would add a vapor intrusion component to the Hazard Ranking System ("HRS"), the primary screening tool for the CERCLA National


Maryland Environmental Reporting Regulations On Hold For Now
  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • USA
  • February 8 2016

Property owners and developers in Maryland have dodged another bullet, at least for now, with respect to their environmental reporting obligations


Changes to Federal Threatened and Endangered Species Rules May Affect Developers and Dischargers
  • Manko Gold Katcher & Fox
  • USA
  • January 25 2016

On January 14, 2016, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) published a rule pursuant to Section 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA


What Two Recent California Supreme Court Rulings Mean for Analysis of Environmental Impact at Project Sites and Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Protected Species
  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • USA
  • January 6 2016

The California Supreme Court recently issued two important decisions involving the interpretation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA


Environmental due diligence: what is a REC?
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • June 16 2014

Many individuals on the business or legal side of transactions involving the transfer of real property understand the primary purposes of performing


When CEQA Violations Are An Afterthought: Fourth District Upholds Trial Court’s Independent Judgment Determination That City Of Anaheim Is Equitably Estopped To Unilaterally Modify Resort Hotel CUP Conditions
  • Miller Starr Regalia
  • USA
  • January 25 2016

CEQA and land use law in California go together like a hand in a glove. Due to CEQA's broad scope and exacting substantive and procedural


State AGs in the news
  • Dickstein Shapiro LLP
  • USA
  • May 15 2014

Bernard Nash and Milton A. Marquis Hot News Blog Post: Think You're Not a Holder of Unclaimed Property? Think Again! All 50 states have unclaimed


CEQA Doesn’t Operate in “Reverse” (Usually)
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • December 21 2015

It's not quite Star Wars, but in the world of land use, this counts as a blockbuster. The California Supreme Court has decided unanimously that the


Tools for Managing Environmental Risks in Deals
  • Dechert LLP
  • USA
  • January 12 2016

When parties to an M&A deal consider most environmental risks, they essentially seek the same goals that they seek with respect to other liabilities