We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,501

The Scope of Continuous Trigger in Pennsylvania
  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • USA
  • December 1 2016

The continuous trigger rule is well-known to those in the insurance industry. However, the scope of its application continues to evolve as new risks


Georgia Court of Appeals takes narrow view of pollution exclusion in lead-based paint case
  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • USA
  • April 6 2015

On March 30, 2015, the Court of Appeals of Georgia held that lead-based paint did not qualify as a pollutant for purposes of a standard pollution


New York court: storm surge is a species of excluded flood
  • Cozen O'Connor
  • USA
  • July 7 2014

One of the most litigated issues in the Gulf States in the wake of Hurricane Katrina was whether flood exclusions bar coverage for loss by storm


Texas Supreme Court will decide important CERCLA insurance matter
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • October 22 2014

The Texas Supreme Court confirmed that it will decide an issue of Texas law that was certified to the Court by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the


Separate contract serves to limit insurance coverage for Deepwater Horizon spill, Texas Supreme Court rules
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • February 26 2015

The Texas Supreme Court rejected BP’s $750 million claim for coverage under Transocean insurance policies. Since the April 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil


Seventh Circuit applies Indiana choice of law rules to deny insurance coverage for contamination at an Indiana manufacturing facility
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • March 9 2015

Hoosier land owners sleep well at night knowing that they are insured against liability for environmental contamination because Indiana does not


Wisconsin Supreme Court applies pollution exclusion to well contaminated with manure
  • Beveridge & Diamond PC
  • USA
  • January 26 2015

Recently, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that the pollution exclusion applies to well water contamination arising from the application of manure to


Appellate division review jurisdiction- employment law, smoking restrictions in state parks
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • April 28 2015

The first quarter of 2015 was harsh in terms of weather and the workload at the Appellate Divisions. However, as opposed to the snow, the caseload did


Multi-million dollar insurance bad faith claim in environmental contamination case affirmed on appeal
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2015

An environmental contamination case resulting in a $3.4 million award for emotional distress and punitive damages due to unfair claims settlement


District court judge confirms summary judgment victory for policyholder regarding the duty to defend and the pollution exclusion
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • April 2 2013

In January, we reported on developments in Wiseman Oil Co. v. TIG Insurance, a case pending in the United States District Court for the Western