We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,392

State AGs in the news
  • Dickstein Shapiro LLP
  • USA
  • September 4 2014

The AGs of Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri and the U.S. Department of Justice simultaneously filed acomplaint and proposed final judgment in the U.S


Eighth Circuit rules that the absolute pollution exclusion applies to the “release” of hazardous lead materials but not to the “distribution” of hazardous lead materials as a product
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • June 21 2013

In two related coverage actions, the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit addressed the application of the absolute pollution exclusion in


Environmental liability - regulatory compliance - insurance coverage (or not)
  • Dentons
  • USA
  • February 20 2014

After looking at numerous investment opportunities, you bite the bullet, assemble a syndicate of lenders and close on a leveraged buyout transaction


Second Circuit canvases case law, upholds pollution exclusion
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • September 13 2013

In Emerson Enterprises, LLC v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. et al., No. 12-4287-CV, 2013 WL 4753564 (2d Cir. Sept. 5, 2013), the Second


Pollution claimsapparently here to stay
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • September 18 2013

With the advent of the "absolute" pollution exclusion in commercial general liability ("CGL") policies in the mid-1980s, many in the insurance


District court judge confirms summary judgment victory for policyholder regarding the duty to defend and the pollution exclusion
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • April 2 2013

In January, we reported on developments in Wiseman Oil Co. v. TIG Insurance, a case pending in the United States District Court for the Western


Ninth Circuit narrows insurers' options in pursuing subrogation claims under CERCLA
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • April 18 2013

The Ninth Circuit confirmed that Chubb could have maintained a subrogation action against potentially liable parties if its insured had made a written


Too much of a good thing: household product triggers pollution exclusion, because "quantity matters"
  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • USA
  • March 22 2013

Pollution exclusion clauses began appearing in commercial general liability policies when federal laws began making businesses liable for the cost of


Eighth Circuit holds defense obligation for environmental claim barred by statute of limitations and indemnity obligation barred by owned property exclusion
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • September 9 2013

In Land O' Lakes, Inc. v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin, No. 12-1752, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 18036 (8th Cir. Aug. 29, 2013


5th Circuit holds late notice bars coverage under buy-back pollution coverage
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • June 21 2013

In its recent decision in Starr Indemnity & Liability Co. v. SGS Petroleum Service Corp., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 12425 (5th Cir. 2013), the United