We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 10,012

Waste Water Management, Inc. (Woodsland Edge Subdivision) Discharge Permits: Arkansas State Game and Fish Commission Voluntary Dismissal of Request for Adjudicatory Hearing
  • Mitchell Williams Selig Gates & Woodyard PLLC
  • USA
  • November 21 2016

The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission (“AGFC”) filed a Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of a Request for Adjudicatory Hearing & Commission Review


California Supreme Court protects CEQA categorical exemptions
  • Latham & Watkins LLP
  • USA
  • March 5 2015

On Monday March 2, the California Supreme Court upheld the use of a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption for a large single-family


TVA’s Tree-Cutting Policy Gets the Axe
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • November 18 2016

On November 17, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit decided the case of Sherwood, et al. v. Tennessee Valley Authority. The Court of


California Supreme Court creates two-part CEQA exemption test in Berkeley Hillside
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • March 4 2015

Developers and agencies seeking to expedite project reviews under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) often chafe under its unique "fair


Environmental case law update (as of Feb. 26, 2015)
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • March 3 2015

Readers may find helpful this recapitulation of recently-decided environmental law cases by the federal and state courts. The U.S. Supreme Court has


Property reserve, Inc. v. Superior Court: when a governmental entry to test and inspect private property may not be a "taking"
  • Miller Starr Regalia
  • USA
  • November 23 2016

A recent decision by the California Supreme Court in Property Reserve, Inc. v. Superior Court1 articulates the roughly four ways the government can


Fourth Circuit to address CERCLA’s intent to dispose standard
  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

On October 30, the Fourth Circuit will hear oral argument in a closely-watched Superfund case, Duke Energy Progress, Inc. v. Consolidation Coal Co


Agreements conditioned on subsequent CEQA review violate CEQA if record shows agency already committed to project
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • November 4 2008

In this case, the California Supreme Court invalidated agreements by the City of West Hollywood (“City”) for a housing project that was conditioned on future environmental review


New York Supreme Court pro rata allocation for MGP sites on Long Island clarifies self-insured periods
  • Beveridge & Diamond PC
  • USA
  • October 31 2014

A New York State trial court judge applied a pro rata time on the risk allocation for pollution from manufactured gas plants on Long Island.Keyspan


Texas petrochemical refinery achieves reasoned victory against Clean Air Act citizen suit
  • Jenner & Block LLP
  • USA
  • January 2 2015

ExxonMobil Corp. (Exxon) operates a refinery complex in Baytown, Texas, which is the largest petroleum and petrochemical complex in the U.S. This