We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,301

Insurer bound by renewal endorsement in expiring policy to offer “substantially similar” coverage despite known losses
  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • USA
  • November 5 2015

In a somewhat unusual insurance coverage case, the Third Circuit gave teeth to a “renewal” clause contained within a ten-year pollution and

Illinois Appellate Court rejects insurer contention that "broad and general" pollution exclusion barred mold-related claims
  • Jenner & Block
  • USA
  • November 5 2015

Certain jurisdictions interpret the pollution exclusion more expansively than others, see, e.g., Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London v. C.A

When is a policy renewal not a renewal?
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • October 23 2015

Acquiring adequate insurance coverage against environmental risks, in particular the spill or release of pollutants or contaminants in day-to-day

VW scandal - don’t set the wheels in motion
  • DAC Beachcroft LLP
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • October 6 2015

German car manufacturer Volkswagen has sent shockwaves across the automotive industry with revelations that it has been rigging diesel emissions

Insurance provides coverage for electric utility’s settlement costs
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • September 21 2015

On Aug. 5, 2015, a federal district court in Louisiana ruled that costs incurred by an electric utility under a settlement with the EPA for measures

Decision by a divided New Jersey Supreme Court protects leaky tank owner and insurers from damages for two-year delay in addressing contamination
  • Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP
  • USA
  • September 9 2015

The recent New Jersey Supreme Court opinion in Ross v. Lowitz, decided by a 4 to 3 vote, holds that insurers are not liable under New Jersey common

Texas Supreme Court rules EPA CERCLA enforcement proceedings are a “suit” insurers must defend
  • Jenner & Block
  • USA
  • August 31 2015

Answering a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the affirmative, the Texas Supreme Court recently

Louisiana federal court finds in favor of coverage for work required by Clean Air Act Consent Decree
  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • USA
  • August 28 2015

A federal court in Louisiana recently interpreted the coverage under a Pollution Legal Liability (PLL) policy and found that certain costs required

Insurer required to cover costs its insured has incurred or will incur to remediate coal pollution
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

A Louisiana federal court held that a general liability insurer must indemnify its policyholder for costs incurred to address violations of the Clean

California: insurers must cover “long tail” claims regardless of corporate reorganization during intervening years
  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • USA
  • August 26 2015

Many insurance policies contain provisions barring assignment of the insured’s rights without the insurer’s consent, which have been interpreted to