We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 45

EPA Committed to Preserving Formaldehyde Focus
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • August 12 2016

From the personal injury lawsuits spawned by formaldehyde composite wood products used in the construction of the FEMA trailers that temporarily


The Gutting of Clean Ohio Brownfields Grants
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • March 7 2016

A March 3 Columbus Dispatch article expressed grave concerns about the lack of grants for brownfields redevelopment in Ohio. The state responded that


Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals throws out PM 2.5 attainment status for Cincinnati
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • July 15 2015

On July 14, 2015, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Sierra Club had standing to challenge EPA’s determination that the Cincinnati


Surprising but welcome: California federal court finds that botched cleanup may create CERCLA liability for California's Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • September 23 2014

In California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Jim Dobbas, Inc., et al, 2014 WL 4627248 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 2014), the United States


Ohio EPA's revised Guide to Environmental Permitting in Ohio
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2014

Ohio EPA released its revised April 2014 Guide to Environmental Permitting in Ohio. The document addresses those situations where permits are


Bona fide prospective purchaser defense rejected by Fourth Circuit because purchaser did not exercise appropriate care after closing
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • April 8 2013

An owner of real property claiming the bona fide prospective purchaser (BFPP) defense under Section 107(r)(1) of CERCLA has the burden of


Clean Ohio fund announces streamlined process for Brownfields funding
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • March 11 2013

In March, 2013, the Clean Ohio Council announced a streamlined process for issuing grants and loans from the Clean Ohio Fund. $15 million is now


EPA and Kentucky sign memorandum of agreement for voluntary site cleanup
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • January 14 2013

As of December 19, 2012, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will now defer to the Kentucky Department for Environmental


Stormwater flow not a “pollutant” under Clean Water Act and EPA may not regulate it as a surrogate, federal court holds
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • January 8 2013

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia recently granted judgment on the pleadings against EPA and held that EPA lacked the


Clean Ohio Fund streamlines approval process for brownfield projects
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • September 25 2012

The Clean Ohio Fund, which has been one of the more successful state sponsored brownfields redevelopment funding programs in the U.S., is streamlining its process