We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 48

President Trump’s Executive Order Regarding “Waters of the United States” and his Deference to Justice Antonin Scalia: Does it Even Matter?
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • March 9 2017

On Feb. 28, 2017, President Trump issued the Executive Order "Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, and Economic Growth by Reviewing the 'Waters of


The “Twofer” Executive Order
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • February 4 2017

On Jan. 30, 2017, President Trump signed the "twofer" Executive Order 13771, which applies not just to environmental regulation. So what exactly did


Risk Management Planning Rule Changes Impose New Requirements
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • December 27 2016

EPA issued a pre-publication draft of a Final Rule on Dec. 21, 2016 amending the existing Risk Management Planning Rule ("RMP") at 40 CFR Part 68


EPA Committed to Preserving Formaldehyde Focus
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • August 12 2016

From the personal injury lawsuits spawned by formaldehyde composite wood products used in the construction of the FEMA trailers that temporarily


The Gutting of Clean Ohio Brownfields Grants
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • March 7 2016

A March 3 Columbus Dispatch article expressed grave concerns about the lack of grants for brownfields redevelopment in Ohio. The state responded that


Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals throws out PM 2.5 attainment status for Cincinnati
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • July 15 2015

On July 14, 2015, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Sierra Club had standing to challenge EPA’s determination that the Cincinnati


Surprising but welcome: California federal court finds that botched cleanup may create CERCLA liability for California's Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • September 23 2014

In California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Jim Dobbas, Inc., et al, 2014 WL 4627248 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 2014), the United States


Ohio EPA's revised Guide to Environmental Permitting in Ohio
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2014

Ohio EPA released its revised April 2014 Guide to Environmental Permitting in Ohio. The document addresses those situations where permits are


Bona fide prospective purchaser defense rejected by Fourth Circuit because purchaser did not exercise appropriate care after closing
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • April 8 2013

An owner of real property claiming the bona fide prospective purchaser (BFPP) defense under Section 107(r)(1) of CERCLA has the burden of


Clean Ohio fund announces streamlined process for Brownfields funding
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • March 11 2013

In March, 2013, the Clean Ohio Council announced a streamlined process for issuing grants and loans from the Clean Ohio Fund. $15 million is now