We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 7,986

Supreme Court of Ohio accepts appeal in two DMA cases
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • November 19 2014

The Supreme Court of Ohio accepted the appeal in Swartz v. Householder and Shannon v. Householder, two related cases involving the 1989 version and


US Supreme Court appoints Special Master in interstate water dispute
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • November 20 2014

A. Gregory Grimsal has been appointed by the US Supreme Court as the Special Master inState of Texas v. State of New Mexico et al., Case No. 220141


Narrowing the field of pre-emption under the Natural Gas Act
  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • USA
  • April 24 2015

Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Natural Gas Act does not confer on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC"


ONEOK, Inc. v. Learjet, Inc.: the Supreme Court holds that natural gas jurisdictional sellers are subject to state antitrust claims
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • April 24 2015

On April 21, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in ONEOK Inc. v. Learjet, Inc. addressing the extent to which the Natural


The myth of the regulatory gap: BLM’s proposed hydraulic fracturing rule compared to existing state law
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • November 19 2014

For the better part of the last decade, oil and natural gas production from domestic wells has increased steadily. Technical advancements in


Panel to rehear conflict minerals case
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • November 18 2014

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has granted the petition for a panel rehearing (as opposed to an en banc rehearing


Ninth Circuit provides clarity on ERA whistleblower protections
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • November 19 2014

On November 7, 2014, the Ninth Circuit issued its ruling in Tamosaitis v. URS Inc. and provided clarity on three key aspects of the whistleblower


Conflict minerals: D.C. Circuit to reconsider conflict minerals ruling; initiatives proceed in the European Union and China
  • Beveridge & Diamond PC
  • China, European Union, USA
  • November 19 2014

Recent developments in the U.S., European Union and China underscore the dynamic nature of evolving supply chain due diligence requirements and


Texas Supreme Court to hear defamation case involving fracking claims
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • August 27 2014

On August 21, 2014, the Texas Supreme Court agreed to hear oral arguments in an ongoing dispute between a homeowner and Texas-based oil driller Range


What’s underground is still up for grabs in Texas
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • March 3 2015

Since the first oilman drilled the first water disposal well, cases have come through the courts in the U.S. trying to determine what rights each