We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 8,619

Conflict minerals challenge to follow resource extraction case to District Court
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • May 1 2013

As previously noted, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia recently dismissed a challenge to the SEC's resource extraction rules for lack

The SEC prevails in the D.C. Circuit
  • Dorsey & Whitney LLP
  • USA
  • May 1 2013

The Dodd-Frank provision requiring the disclosure of certain payments made to foreign governments relating to the commercial development of oil

New decision may impede fracking on federal land
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • May 2 2013

Recently, a California federal court blocked drilling on certain federal land located in California's Monterey Shale Formation play. In reaching its

Pennsylvania Supreme Court clarifies shale gas leasehold rights
  • Blank Rome LLP
  • USA
  • May 2 2013

In a 6-0 decision which has been much anticipated by both natural gas producers and landowners, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court finally cleared up

Enviros contest TVA decision
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • April 29 2013

On April 25, The Tennessee Environmental Council, the Tennessee Scenic River Association, the Sierra Club, and the Center for Biological Diversity

Defective acknowledgement does not invalidate oil and gas lease according to Ohio courts
  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • USA
  • May 6 2013

On April 15, 2013, U.S. District Judge John R. Adams of the Northern District of Ohio dismissed Ohio landowners' claim that oil and gas leases not

Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirms the Dunham rule and restores certainty to oil and gas law
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • May 1 2013

Last August, we reported that a Pennsylvania Superior Court decision (Butler v. Charles Powers Estate) threatened to undermine nearly 200 years of

Sierra Club ordered to pay $6.4m in attorneys fees for filing frivolous CAA lawsuit
  • Jenner & Block LLP
  • USA
  • September 5 2014

On September 2, 2014, a United States District Court for the Western District of Texas ordered that the Sierra Club reimburse Energy Future Holdings

Ohio seventh district ruling addresses Ohio Dormant Mineral Act application
  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • September 8 2014

In Eisenbarth v. Reusser, 7th Dist. Monroe No. 13 MO 10 (Aug. 28, 2014), the Seventh Appellate District of Ohio recently addressed issues concerning

US Supreme Court denied certiorari regarding the constitutionality of California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard
  • Latham & Watkins LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2014

Today, the US Supreme Court denied certiorari regarding the constitutionality of California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) in Rocky Mountain