We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 8,475

7th Circuit affirms socializing costs of multi-value electric transmission projects
  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • USA
  • June 27 2013

On June 7, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued a decision in Illinois Commerce Commission, et al. v. Federal Energy Regulatory

Further clarification on the constitutionality of exported coal reclamation fee is delayed
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • May 28 2014

The D.C. Circuit has decided against ruling on the substance of whether the Abandoned Mine Land reclamation fee and the regulatory methods the Office

Flaring litigation in North Dakota is capped
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • June 3 2014

A North Dakota federal judge recently dismissed a group of proposed class actions alleging that certain oil and gas companies operating in the state

Damage models create individualized issues for pre-explosion subclass of BP shareholders, but present no impediment for post-explosion subclass
  • Carlton Fields
  • USA
  • June 3 2014

The Southern District of Texas recently denied certification of a subclass of BP shareholders who purchased shares prior to the Deepwater Horizon

Enerwise Global Technologies, Inc. demand response strikes out at Camden Yards
  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2013

The recent Enerwise settlement order provides another example of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's willingness to pursue million dollar

Court finds successor corporation liable for CERCLA response costs
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 3 2013

Last month, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California found Sterling Centrecorp, Inc. liable for the costs of cleaning up the

Shell Oil Co. v. United States -- a divided Federal Circuit identifies an exception to the rule that "no good deed goes unpunished"
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • June 3 2014

It would be almost impossible to identify all of the individuals and companies that were critical to America's war efforts during World War II. The

Federal court vacates SEC’s extraction payment disclosure rule
  • Arnold & Porter LLP
  • USA
  • July 8 2013

On July 2, 2013, Judge John D. Bates of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (the District Court) vacated a new rule promulgated by

SEC seeks rehearing of conflicts minerals decision
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • May 31 2014

The SEC has filed documentation with the District of Columbia Court of Appeals seeking an en bancrehearing of the conflict minerals decision. The

No implied duty to develop Marcellus
  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • July 5 2013

So holds the Pennsylvania Superior Court in Caldwell v. Kriebel Resources Co., No. 1305-WDA-2012 (June 21, 2013). Plaintiffs sued because the