We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 6,603

U.S. Supreme Court lets Natural Gas Act preemption seep away
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 7 2015

In Oneok, Inc. v. Learjet, Inc., No. 13-271 (April 21, 2015), the U.S. Supreme Court held in a 7-2 opinion that state law antitrust claims against


Updates on Supreme Court Dormant Mineral Act cases
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2015

On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear the oral argument in Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., et al., a case


Perspective on El Pasodespite finding of liability for general partner, no increased scrutiny of directors and bankers in MLP dropdown situations
  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP
  • USA
  • May 7 2015

The Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled, in In re El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. Derivative Litigation (Apr. 20, 2015), that the general partner


Practice points for MLP conflict committees, investment bankers, and general partners arising from most recent El Paso decision
  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP
  • USA
  • May 7 2015

The Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled, in In re El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. Derivative Litigation (Apr. 20, 2015), that the general partner


Court of Federal Claims limits Section 1603 grant for biomass cogeneration facility
  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • USA
  • January 20 2015

As a number of cases involving Section 1603 renewable energy grants are making their way through the US Court of Federal Claims, the court issued its


Fifth Circuit narrowly rejects petition for en banc rehearing in In Re: Deepwater Horizon civil penalty ruling
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • January 16 2015

On November 5, 2014, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit refused to reconsider its June 2014 decision affirming the District


EPA's proposals to regulate CO2 emissions from power plants: reasonable (perhaps) by legislation, but challenging via the Clean Air Act
  • Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP
  • USA
  • January 22 2015

In January 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reproposed standards of performance regulating carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from


Conflict minerals rule weekly recap 97 March 9, 2015
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • March 9 2015

Last fall, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted the SEC’s petition for rehearing of the Court’s April 2014 decision that found


SEC files brief in conflict minerals rehearing
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • December 8 2014

The SEC has filed its brief in the conflict minerals rehearing. Amnesty International also filed its brief as intervenor and Free Speech for People


SEC, Amnesty and others file briefs in support of upholding the conflict minerals disclosure requirement
  • Cooley LLP
  • USA
  • December 9 2014

In November, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the petitions of the SEC and Amnesty International for panel rehearing in connection with the