We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 4,054

Why no employers should ‘like’ the constitutional protection of the Facebook ‘like’
  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • USA
  • November 5 2013

In yet another example of a court applying traditional First Amendment principles to modern technology, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit


What you should know about electronic subscriptions and copyright law: a best practices guide
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • August 19 2013

Increasingly, printed matter is being made available via the Internet in electronic form, and both publishers and readers alike are starting to


NLRB protects workers’ right to use employer email systems for union activities
  • Pepper Hamilton LLP
  • USA
  • December 17 2014

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board), in its December 11 Purple Communications, Inc. and Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO


NLRB rejects ban on personal e-mail at work
  • Carlton Fields
  • USA
  • December 17 2014

On December 11, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) continued to intrude into the workplace by holding that employees have a right to use their


U.S. Supreme Courts further defines the parameters of compensable pre- and post-shift activities; NLRB reverses course on employer restrictions on company e-mail
  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • USA
  • December 16 2014

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision that limits the types of pre- and post-shift activities that are compensable under


Opening Pandora’s inbox: potential impact of NLRB’s decision to grant employee access to company email systems
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • USA
  • December 16 2014

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has arguably swung Pandora's box wide open by declaring that employees who have access to a company email


Courts continue to define the strength of Oregon’s robust anti-SLAPP statute
  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • USA
  • January 7 2015

Oregon is now entering its fourteenth year of anti-SLAPP litigation under a decidedly robust statute (Ors 31.150 to .155). Courts broadly apply the


NLRB weighs in on employers’ right to monitor workplace communications
  • Arnstein & Lehr LLP
  • USA
  • March 24 2015

It has traditionally been understood and recognized that employees do not have an expectation of privacy when using their employer's computer system


Is LinkedIn’s Reference Search function subject to the Fair Credit Reporting Act?
  • Briggs and Morgan
  • USA
  • April 20 2015

No - the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California recently dismissed a complaint alleging Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA


Terminating employee for calling boss a “nasty mother fker violated NLRA
  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • USA
  • April 24 2015

In Pier Sixty, LLC and Hernan Perez and Evelyn Gonzalez, the National Labor Relations Board (the "NLRB" or the "Board") held that an employee's