We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 40,090

Are Title VII retaliation claims dead post-Nassar?
  • Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
  • USA
  • October 16 2013

This June, the U.S. Supreme Court announced the causation standard for Title VII retaliations claims in the landmark case of University of Texas


Is forum shopping for equal rights on the horizon?
  • Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
  • USA
  • May 15 2014

Race discrimination claims brought by members of the racial majority have long been recognized as legitimate claims under Title VII of the Civil


Enough is enough: Retail Litigation Center advises court that the EEOC has overstepped in attack on releases
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • May 13 2014

As many of our loyal readers are aware, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District


Arbitration agreement withstands challenge for lack of notice of arbitration rules or mutuality
  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • USA
  • October 16 2013

In Peng v. First Republic Bank, a former employee asserting discrimination and other claims challenged the enforceability of the arbitration


Buyer beware: hiring competitor’s star executive may not only get you sued but get you sued in the competitor’s favorite court
  • Zuckerman Spaeder LLP
  • USA
  • May 15 2014

We have written before here on Suits by Suits about the risk to a company hiring an executive from a competitor of being sued by the competitor for


Latest development in EEOC’s appeal of $4.7 million fee award in the Eighth Circuit
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • May 13 2014

Our loyal readers know that we have been monitoring closely the proceedings in the EEOC's appeal of the largest fee sanction award against the agency


Virginia Supreme Court rules enforceability of non-competes cannot be determined in a factual vacuum
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • October 14 2013

A recent Supreme Court of Virginia decision will make it more difficult to challenge non-compete restrictions through early pleading challenges. In


Beware “napkin agreement” modifications to at-will employment
  • Briggs and Morgan
  • USA
  • May 16 2014

How many significant developments are claimed to have been written on the back of a napkin or envelope? Certainly, such brevity can hold great


Limiting successor liability under the FLSA: wage and hour due diligence
  • Franczek Radelet PC
  • USA
  • May 14 2014

Recently, my colleague Lindsey Marcus guest authored a post on yet another successor liability case, this time out of the Third Circuit. Her post


Q&A for pesky summer service personnel issues
  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • USA
  • May 14 2014

An issue that arises every summer for counties relates to summer employment and summer seniority for service personnel. W. Va. Code 18-5-39(f