We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 36,490

New York State Supreme Court finds 24-hour home care attendants must be paid for sleep and meal periods
  • Littler Mendelson PC
  • USA
  • March 25 2015

The New York State Department of Labor ("NY DOL") has consistently enforced the New York Labor Law ("NYLL") as permitting third-party employers of


Can state medical marijuana laws trump employer rights?
  • Cozen O'Connor
  • USA
  • October 30 2014

Currently, 23 states and the District of Columbia have medical marijuana laws which allow a lawful level of marijuana use. One question which comes


Where did my customer go? Some pleading parameters for tortious interference
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • October 30 2014

A Federal court in New York recently provided some pleading parameters for employers for claims of tortious interference with business relations. In


Alert! Raising the stakes: NLRB expands remedies for labor law violations
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • October 31 2014

The price of poker just went up for employers facing unfair labor practice charges before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB, or Board). On


Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issues two significant opinions for employers
  • Ogletree Deakins
  • USA
  • May 28 2015

In April 2015, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts issued two important decisions providing guidance for employers on the scope of


Is the MDL a “sophisticated misuser” of California law? California appellate court refuses to apply sophisticated user doctrine, rebukes feds
  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • USA
  • October 31 2014

A California appellate court has refused to apply the sophisticated user doctrine to bar the claims of the family of a career U.S. Navy shipyard


California employer that did not gain benefit from employee’s use of car is not liable for accident
  • Ogletree Deakins
  • USA
  • October 1 2014

In a recent decision, the California Court of Appeal held that under the “going and coming” rule, an employer was not vicariously liable for an


Can you reject a candidate that you don’t think will “fit in” with your team? Not if you want summary judgment in the Second Circuit
  • Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

Just how specific do you need to be when explaining why you rejected a minority candidate multiple times for a job that did not even mean a pay raise


Scholastic, Inc. v. Viley -- employee-friendly workers' comp case that considers the 'extended premises' doctrine and injuries 'arising out ofin the course of' employment
  • Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • USA
  • October 30 2014

Said differently, a man was awarded workers' compensation for injuries he sustained from slipping on ice in a parking lot when he was leaving work


Special in person handshakes are now the only way to verify receipt of a communication?
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • October 30 2014

Under the Family Medical Leave Act ("FMLA"), the process for providing an employee with leave arguably generates enough paper to defoliate a small