We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,241

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issues two significant opinions for employers
  • Ogletree Deakins
  • USA
  • May 28 2015

In April 2015, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts issued two important decisions providing guidance for employers on the scope of


Should employers guess their applicants’ religion? SCOTUS expected to face accommodations issues head on
  • Ogletree Deakins
  • USA
  • May 26 2015

The Supreme Court of the United States is poised to decide a case that should clarify employers' obligations to provide applicants with


California Supreme Court agrees to consider whether California health care workers can lawfully waive a second lunch period.
  • Ogletree Deakins
  • USA
  • May 22 2015

This week, the California Supreme Court agreed to review the decision in Gerard v. Orange Coast Memorial Center, No. G048039 (February 10, 2015


Wisconsin Supreme Court holds that continued employment constitutes adequate consideration for restrictive covenants
  • Ogletree Deakins
  • USA
  • May 11 2015

The Wisconsin Supreme Court recently issued a decision holding that continued employment is adequate consideration for restrictive covenants. In


California Court of Appeal reminds employers about the importance of thorough harassment investigations
  • Ogletree Deakins
  • USA
  • May 4 2015

In an unpublished opinion, a California Court of Appeal reversed an order granting summary judgment in favor of the employer, Country Club of Rancho


California employer successful in arbitration policy dispute
  • Ogletree Deakins
  • USA
  • May 4 2015

The California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District recently upheld an arbitration award in favor of an employer despite the


California confectioner defeats worker’s age discrimination claim
  • Ogletree Deakins
  • USA
  • May 4 2015

Discrimination claims often ensue after a reduction in force (RIF) because laid off employees second-guess management’s selection process. However, as seen in a recent unpublished California Court of Appeal decision, a


Caltrans liable for failure to properly address employee’s requests for accommodation
  • Ogletree Deakins
  • USA
  • May 4 2015

In an unpublished opinion, the California Court of Appeal recently upheld a jury’s verdict finding the California Department of Transportation


Automobile service advisers are not exempt under the FLSAat least not according to the Ninth Circuit
  • Ogletree Deakins
  • USA
  • May 4 2015

The plaintiffs in Navarro v. Encino Motorcars, LLCwere “service advisors” at a Mercedes Benz dealership. The main duties of service advisors are to


California court finds arbitration agreement did not unlawfully limit judicial review
  • Ogletree Deakins
  • USA
  • May 4 2015

In an unpublished opinion, the California Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District overturned a trial court’s ruling denying an employer’s