We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 143

The Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • October 16 2015

Second Circuit affirms district court's holding that Google's creation of searchable, digital copies of tens of millions of books constitutes fair


UMG Recordings Inc. v. Veoh Networks Inc.
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • March 28 2013

Ninth Circuit upholds DMCA safe harbor protection from copyright infringement liability for defendant video-sharing site Veoh, affirming grant of summary judgment in defendants’ favor


Barclays Capital Inc., et al. v. Theflyonthewall.com
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • March 24 2010

After a bench trial, the district court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff financial institutions on their claims of copyright infringement and "hot news misappropriation" against online aggregator of financial information


CBS Broadcasting Inc. v. FilmOn.com, Inc.
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • February 22 2016

Second Circuit affirms district court order finding Internet-based television provider FilmOn violated consent order and permanent injunction by


Capitol Records Inc. v. Thomas-Rasset
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • September 13 2012

Circuit court reinstates $222,000 statutory damages award against defendant, individual, for willful infringement related to her downloading and making available through peer-to-peer file-sharing service 24 copyrighted sound recordings of plaintiffs, holding that award did not violate due process standards and that plaintiff was entitled to broader injunction


In re Hulu privacy litigation
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • April 6 2015

District court rejects Video Privacy Protection Act claim against video streaming provider Hulu, finding insufficient evidence that Hulu knowingly


Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Rapp
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • October 29 2008

The Florida Supreme Court held that the state no longer recognizes a cause of action for false light invasion of privacy because it overlaps with defamation and “allows the plaintiff to circumvent the strict requirements that have been adopted by statute and developed by case law to ensure the right to freedom of expression.”


Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American Buddha
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • March 30 2011

New York’s highest court, answering a certified question from the Second Circuit, holds that in a copyright infringement action where a copyrighted literary work is uploaded to the Internet, for purposes of determining jurisdiction under New York’s long-arm statute, the situs of the injury is the copyright holder’s principal place of business


Starr, et al. v. Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al.
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • January 27 2010

Second Circuit holds that the plaintiff class adequately pled violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act against defendant producers and distributors of digital music, where the defendants’ alleged parallel conduct in selling music over the internet plausibly suggested that defendants entered into an agreement to fix prices and to restrain the availability and distribution of music over the internet


Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc, et al v. Fung, et al
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • January 20 2010

In copyright infringement action against operator of BitTorrent websites, court grants summary judgment to plaintiff movie studios on liability for inducement to infringe