We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 251

States further attempt to protect minors' privacy online
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • April 10 2014

Following the adoption of a California law protecting minors under the age of 18 online, Delaware has now introduced House Bill 261, which would add


IRS addresses tax consequences of acquiring and spending Bitcoin
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • April 12 2014

On March 25, 2014, the IRS issued Notice 2014-21 addressing the United States Federal income tax consequences of transactions involving Bitcoin and


UMG Recordings, Inc, et al v Veoh Networks, Inc, et al
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • February 18 2009

The district court dismissed claims of contributory and vicarious copyright infringement and inducement to infringe as to defendants who were investors in Veoh Networks


FTC staff issues revised principles and guidance for online behavioral advertising
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • February 19 2009

In December, 2007, Federal Trade Commission staff issued proposed principles for online behavioral advertising


The Associated Press v All Headline News Corp, et al
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2009

The Southern District of New York determined that it will hear The Associated Press’s claims that All Headline News is misappropriating “hot news,” but dismissed two of the AP’s claims against AHN


Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Rapp
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • October 29 2008

The Florida Supreme Court held that the state no longer recognizes a cause of action for false light invasion of privacy because it overlaps with defamation and “allows the plaintiff to circumvent the strict requirements that have been adopted by statute and developed by case law to ensure the right to freedom of expression.”


Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., et al.
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • November 12 2008

The district court denied Universal Music Corp.’s request for an interlocutory appeal relating to the court’s August 20, 2008, order in which the court held that a copyright owner, in order to proceed in good faith under the DMCA, must consider whether an individual’s use of a copyrighted work is a fair use before sending a take-down notice


Online advertising goes to court
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • December 2 2008

In a clear indication that online privacy concerns are on the rise, a class action complaint has been filed against several companies that use consumer data obtained through "deep packet inspection," a technology that tracks and consolidates all web-related information for an individual at the ISP level, in order to provide targeted online advertising


Regulations affecting internet gambling
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • December 2 2008

On November 12, the U.S. Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve Board issued a new rule implementing the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act that was signed into law in October, 2006


Capitol Records, LLC, et al. v. Videoegg, Inc., et al.
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • March 18 2009

The district court held that California-based defendant Hi5 Networks, which operates a social networking web site where allegedly infringing video files are posted, had sufficient contacts with New York to exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendant, and then granted the defendant’s motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of California