We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-15 of 15

Court holds defense costs outside policy limits
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • June 1 2010

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, applying California law, has affirmed an arbitration ruling that defense costs paid by an insurer on behalf of an insured under a business management and indemnity policy did not erode the policy’s $1 million limit of liability


Delaware Supreme Court enforces consent to settle clause and precludes coverage
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • August 25 2009

The Supreme Court of Delaware, applying Missouri law, has held that an insurer acted in good faith in objecting to a settlement reached at a mediation that it did not attend pursuant to an agreement with the insured


Sixth Circuit holds that coverage of arbitration claims barred by policy exclusion
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • September 2 2009

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has held that, under Ohio law, an insured was not entitled to coverage for defense costs where allegations in the underlying complaint did not state a claim potentially within the scope of the policy’s coverage


Insurer bound by award in arbitration of which it had notice but in which it decided not to participate
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • March 23 2009

The California Court of Appeal has held that an insurer that was notified of an underlying arbitration demand against its insured, an insolvent financial services firm, and was given an opportunity to participate in the arbitration was bound by the resulting award and judgment despite not having participated or having undertaken a duty to defend


Evidence of oral settlement agreement reached in mediation inadmissible
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • August 19 2008

The Supreme Court of California has held that evidence of an oral settlement made in the course of mediation was inadmissible under California’s mediation confidentiality statutes