We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-15 of 15

Sixth Circuit holds that coverage of arbitration claims barred by policy exclusion
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • September 2 2009

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has held that, under Ohio law, an insured was not entitled to coverage for defense costs where allegations in the underlying complaint did not state a claim potentially within the scope of the policy’s coverage


Evidence of oral settlement agreement reached in mediation inadmissible
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • August 19 2008

The Supreme Court of California has held that evidence of an oral settlement made in the course of mediation was inadmissible under California’s mediation confidentiality statutes


Claimant is collaterally estopped from asserting that arbitration award triggers coverage under lawyers professional liability policy
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • December 10 2010

The Court of Appeals of North Carolina has held that a claimant is collaterally estopped from asserting that an arbitration award triggers coverage under an insured's lawyers professional liability policy where the arbitration award found the insured liable solely in his capacity as a fund manager


First Circuit holds no coverage under E&O policy for agency's breach of exclusivity clause
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2007

The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, applying Massachusetts law, has held that coverage was not available under an insurance agent and broker E&O policy for an arbitration award assessed against a policyholder for its breach of an agency agreement because the claims at issue arose out of the policyholder's ordinary business decisions rather than from its exercise of professional skills


Insurer bound by award in arbitration of which it had notice but in which it decided not to participate
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • March 23 2009

The California Court of Appeal has held that an insurer that was notified of an underlying arbitration demand against its insured, an insolvent financial services firm, and was given an opportunity to participate in the arbitration was bound by the resulting award and judgment despite not having participated or having undertaken a duty to defend