We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-15 of 15

Claimant is collaterally estopped from asserting that arbitration award triggers coverage under lawyers professional liability policy
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • November 2 2010

The Court of Appeals of North Carolina has held that a claimant is collaterally estopped from asserting that an arbitration award triggers coverage under an insured's lawyers professional liability policy where the arbitration award found the insured liable solely in his capacity as a fund manager


Court holds defense costs outside policy limits
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • June 1 2010

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, applying California law, has affirmed an arbitration ruling that defense costs paid by an insurer on behalf of an insured under a business management and indemnity policy did not erode the policy’s $1 million limit of liability


Magistrate enforces arbitration clause in inter-insurer dispute
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • March 12 2010

US Magistrate Judge P Trevor Sharp of the Middle District of North Carolina, applying federal law of arbitration to a motion to stay, has issued a recommendation that the district court stay an insurer's third-party claim against another insurer based on the arbitration clause in the defendant-insurer's policy


Delaware Supreme Court enforces consent to settle clause and precludes coverage
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • August 25 2009

The Supreme Court of Delaware, applying Missouri law, has held that an insurer acted in good faith in objecting to a settlement reached at a mediation that it did not attend pursuant to an agreement with the insured


Sixth Circuit holds that coverage of arbitration claims barred by policy exclusion
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • September 2 2009

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has held that, under Ohio law, an insured was not entitled to coverage for defense costs where allegations in the underlying complaint did not state a claim potentially within the scope of the policy’s coverage