We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-15 of 15

First Circuit holds no coverage under E&O policy for agency's breach of exclusivity clause
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2007

The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, applying Massachusetts law, has held that coverage was not available under an insurance agent and broker E&O policy for an arbitration award assessed against a policyholder for its breach of an agency agreement because the claims at issue arose out of the policyholder's ordinary business decisions rather than from its exercise of professional skills


Court holds defense costs outside policy limits
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • June 1 2010

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, applying California law, has affirmed an arbitration ruling that defense costs paid by an insurer on behalf of an insured under a business management and indemnity policy did not erode the policy’s $1 million limit of liability


Insurance agent’s employee not an “insured” when alleged to be acting on behalf of an uninsured agency
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • November 18 2013

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, applying Texas law, has held that an insurance agent's E&O carrier had no duty


Evidence of oral settlement agreement reached in mediation inadmissible
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • August 19 2008

The Supreme Court of California has held that evidence of an oral settlement made in the course of mediation was inadmissible under California’s mediation confidentiality statutes


Declaratory judgment action dismissed due to insureds’ failure to comply with ADR clause
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • August 21 2012

Applying California law, the United States District Court for the Central District of California has dismissed a declaratory judgment action on the grounds that the insureds failed to comply with policy conditions requiring the insureds to pursue alternative dispute resolution prior to filing a judicial proceeding