We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 86

Lewis v. Epic Systems Opinion - Seventh Circuit Swimming Against the Tide on Mandatory Individual Arbitration
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • May 31 2016

In a sweeping May 26 opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit shook up the arbitral landscape and created a remarkable circuit


The Next Chapter - Uber Responds to District Court Order With a New Arbitration Agreement
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • December 15 2015

Not only did Uber respond to the district court's December 9, 2015, ruling (discussed in our December 11 blog) with an immediate notice of appeal


The widening California divide: the rejection of Iskanian by federal district courts and potential resolution
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • January 6 2015

In an October 22, 2014, posting, we addressed the growing divide between California federal district courts and the California Supreme Court over


Age discrimination claims under Ohio law may be barred by internal grievance process
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • June 8 2009

On June 2, 2009, the Ohio Supreme Court held that an age discrimination claim filed by a former employee of United Parcel Systems ("UPS") was barred because an earlier internal "arbitration" proceeding found that the employee had been terminated for just cause


Seventh Circuit Bucks the Trend, Holding That Class and Collective Action Waivers in Employee Arbitration Agreements Violate the NLRA
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • June 8 2016

In Lewis v. Epic Systems Corp., No. 15-2997 (7th Cir. May 26, 2016) (slip op.), the Seventh Circuit held that class and collective action waivers in


Justices pass on second opportunity to resolve the California PAGA divide in the Bridgestone case
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • June 3 2015

For a second time the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a case challenging a California Supreme Court holding that the state’s Private Attorneys


Following the Sixth Circuit’s lead, Ohio appellate courts find whether an agreement allows class arbitration is a “gateway issue”
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • September 9 2015

As we stated previously, the potential impact of whether entitlement to class arbitration is a “gateway issue” will likely diminish with each passing


District Judge Rules Uber’s Arbitration Agreements Unenforceable on Public Policy Grounds
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • December 11 2015

On September 2, we addressed the much-publicized O’Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc. case (No. 13-cv-03826-EMC) pending before the U.S. District


Russell v. Citigroup Inc. language in revised arbitration agreement torpedoes its application to pending class action
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • April 15 2014

A Sixth Circuit panel found the text of an updated arbitration agreement indicated it did not apply to a wage and hour class action already pending


Does D.R. Horton apply arbitration agreements without a class action waiver?
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • February 6 2014

Our sister blog, Employment Law Spotlight, recently reported on the decision of an NLRB administrative law judge regarding the legality of an