We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 148,989

Nominative Fair Use: The Second Circuit Joins Neither The Third Nor Ninth Circuits In Its Approach
  • Akerman LLP
  • USA
  • May 31 2016

In an important decision delineating the boundaries of fair use of another person’s trademark, the Second Circuit announced a standard by which


Claims to Managing Electronic Messages Held to be Not Patent-Eligible
  • Bejin Bieneman plc
  • USA
  • May 31 2016

A court was easily able to analogize claims of two patents directed to electronic messaging to manual communications processes; the court


On Sale Bar Invalidates Safyral, Beyaz Folate Patent
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • May 31 2016

In Merck & CIE v. Watson Laboratories, Inc., the Federal Circuit found communications between Merck and a potential joint venture partner amounted to


Health Alert (Australia) 30 May 2016
  • DLA Piper LLP
  • Australia, USA
  • May 30 2016

The Supreme Court of New South Wales heard an application for approval of a settlement of personal injury proceedings in which medical negligence was


Bucking the Trend: PTAB Grants Motion to Amend, Allows Grouping of References
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 30 2016

In a rare move, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) granted a motion to amend in an inter partes review (IPR), allowing entry of


Is Machine-or-Transformation Test Unnecessary Under AliceMayo?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 30 2016

Addressing the application of the “machine-or-transformation test” in the context of a covered business method (CBM) patent review, the Patent Trial


How to Apply Phillips to CBM Review
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 30 2016

Addressing the claim construction standard for a covered business method (CBM) patent review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board


Financial Hook for CBM Review Can Be Shallow but Must Be Rooted in Claims
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 30 2016

Addressing the eligibility standard for covered business method (CBM) patent reviews, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) recently


Even Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Must Be Anchored in Specification
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 30 2016

Addressing claim construction issues in the context of an ex parte reexamination, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rejected the Patent


Substantial Evidence or Clear Error? Aligning the Standard of Review for IPR Appeals
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 30 2016

Denying Merck’s petition for rehearing en banc, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit refused to decide whether a more searching standard