We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 21,150

Considerable costsSupreme Court requires EPA to consider cost impacts of power plant toxic emissions rules
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

A closely divided Supreme Court has determined that EPA must consider cost when regulating emissions of hazardous air pollutants from stationary


IRS confirms that flip partnership guidelines do not apply to solar projects
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

The IRS has advised that the flip partnership guidelines under Rev. Proc. 2007-65, 2007-2 C.B. 967, do not apply to solar facilities or other


U.S. Supreme Court limits EPA authority to regulate power plant emissions
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court held that EPA must consider compliance costs before regulating hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from coal- and oil-fired


The Supreme Court’s EPA coal rules decision may still accelerate move to natural gas
  • Berger Singerman LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

The United States Supreme Court on June 29, 2015, saved electric utilities, and ultimately electric customers, billions of dollars a year when it


The Sidley shale gas and hydraulic fracturing report - June 29 2015
  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sent two proposed rules relating to oil and gas development to the White House Office of Management and Budget


Division asking for pre-rule site construction information
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

Ohio’s Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management anticipates that the new Horizontal Well Site Construction Rules will become effective July 16


Supreme Court finds EPA unreasonably failed to consider costs when regulating power plant emissions
  • Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

Today the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) improperly refused to consider costs when it decided to


FERC confirms distribution cooperatives must purchase QF output
  • Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

A distribution cooperative must purchase the electrical output made available to it by a qualifying facility (QF), notwithstanding restrictions in


U.S. Supreme Court invalidates EPA’s regulation of mercury from power plants
  • Jenner & Block
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

On June 29, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and invalidated U.S. EPA's 2012 regulation of


"Capacious" term dooms MATS Rule - does it say anything about the Clean Power Plan?
  • McCarter & English LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

The Energy Information Agency predicted the retirement of up to 60 gigawatts of coal-fired electricity generation by 2020. A significant contributor