We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 6,150

New Delaware Unclaimed Property Decision Further Complicates Landscape
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 29 2016

Another federal judge slams Delaware’s unclaimed property audit methodology but rejects the holder’s reliance on the priority rules as a defense to


Claim Differentiation Doctrine Does Not Overcome Construction Dictated by Written Description or Prosecution History
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 28 2016

Addressing the application of the claim differentiation doctrine in claim construction, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the


PTO Must Apply Phillips Standard when Construing Expired Patents
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 28 2016

In an opinion addressing the standard for claim construction of a patent that expires during reexamination, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal


Once Again, Written Description Does Not Limit Claim Scope
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 28 2016

Addressing the interplay between the written description and claim construction, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the district


Post-Grant Review May Be Used to Invalidate Patents Directed to Patent-Ineligible Subject Matter
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 28 2016

Addressing patent-eligible subject matter issues, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) issued a Final Written Decision in a post-grant


PTAB Refusal to Permit Claim Amendments Remanded
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 28 2016

Addressing the standard for granting a motion to amend claims in inter partes review (IPR), the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rejected


A GUI Situation for CBM
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 28 2016

Addressing the issue of subject matter eligibility for Covered Business Method (CBM) patent jurisdiction under 18(d)(1) of the America Invents


PTAB Rejects Consideration of New Issues on Remand
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 28 2016

Addressing the scope of a remand from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) declined to


Incomplete Preemption Does Not Result in Patent-Eligible Subject Matter
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 28 2016

In a Final Written Decision of a Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) found the challenged


Generalized Common Sense Allegations Cannot Be Used to Supply Important Missing Claim Limitation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 28 2016

Addressing the use of common sense for an obviousness analysis, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that conclusory statements about