We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 447

Updates from across the world
  • DAC Beachcroft
  • Argentina, Australia, Bermuda, Singapore, Spain, Turkey, USA, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Philippines, Romania, Serbia, China, European Union, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Ireland
  • September 1 2016

June saw the launch by the French Data Protection Authority, the CNIL, of a public consultation on the EU General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR"

Global Employment Law - What's New? Spring 2016
  • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
  • Belgium, European Union, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, USA
  • April 27 2016

While the European Commission is working towards issuing guidelines on how to apply existing EU legislation to the sharing economy, several countries

Corporate criminal liability - April 2016
  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • Asia-Pacific, Australia, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, USA, Luxembourg, Netherlands, OECD, Poland, Romania, Russia, Global, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Belgium, China, Czech Republic, European Union, France, Germany
  • April 26 2016

The survey looks at whether there is a concept of corporate criminal liability in a number of different jurisdictions. We consider the underlying

Global Privacy & Cybersecurity Update, Issue 9 - March 2016
  • Jones Day
  • Belgium, Brazil, Spain, Taiwan, USA, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Peru, Canada, China, Colombia, European Union, France, Germany
  • March 17 2016

For decades, EU data protection rules have set some of the world's highest standards of data protection and are currently undergoing significant

Privacy en de bescherming van persoonsgegevens in 2016
  • Taylor Wessing
  • European Union, Netherlands, USA
  • February 5 2016

In 2016 staat er een aantal veranderingen op de agenda op privacy-gebied. In dit Artikel worden deze punten in vogelvlucht behandeld.Wetswijzigingen

Safe Harbour is dood. Lang leve Safe Harbour 2.0?
  • Bird & Bird
  • European Union, Netherlands, USA
  • January 27 2016

In een baanbrekende uitspraak heeft het Hof van Justitie (Grote Kamer) op 6 oktober 2015 de belangrijkste basis voor de doorgifte van

Global: 2015 Highlights
  • DLA Piper LLP
  • Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, European Union, USA, Venezuela, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, Mexico, Netherlands, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Italy, Japan
  • December 17 2015

In this month's edition of Be Global, we bring you a summary of the most significant international employment law developments from the past 12

Global privacy & cybersecurity update Issue 8 - November 2015
  • Jones Day
  • Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, United Kingdom, USA, Mexico, Netherlands, Peru, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan, China, European Union, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan
  • November 16 2015

In July, President Obama appointed Dr. Raymond Cook to the position of Chief Information Officer of the Intelligence Community, Office of the

Global employment law what's new? Fall 2015
  • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
  • Austria, Belgium, European Union, France, Germany, United Kingdom, USA, Global, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Russia, Spain
  • October 22 2015

Economic and trade sanctions have become a favoured geopolitical tool of governments. The rules are complex, ever evolving, and the violation risks

Multinationals’ risks of being subject to court proceedings in their home jurisdictions for acts committed overseas- EU versus US position
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • European Union, Netherlands, United Kingdom, USA
  • March 5 2015

The recent settlement of claims brought by Nigerian fishermen in the English courts against the oil company Shell serves as a reminder that