We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 297

Back to school: Brushing up on your data protection lessons
  • Loyens & Loeff
  • Belgium, European Union, USA
  • August 31 2016

As you may recall, in January 2016, on the occasion of the international "Data Protection Day", we sent a news update reflecting on the highlights in


Global privacy & cybersecurity update, issue 6 - May 2015
  • Jones Day
  • Argentina, Paraguay, Peru, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, USA, France, Germany, Honduras, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, European Union
  • May 13 2015

On February 11, the U.S. Government Accountability Office ("GAO") released its biennial High Risk List, which is "intended to help inform the


Global Privacy & Cybersecurity Update, Issue 9 - March 2016
  • Jones Day
  • Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Taiwan, USA, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Peru, Spain, China, Colombia, European Union, France, Germany, Hong Kong
  • March 17 2016

For decades, EU data protection rules have set some of the world's highest standards of data protection and are currently undergoing significant


Global employment law what's new? Fall 2015
  • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
  • Austria, Belgium, Netherlands, Russia, Spain, United Kingdom, USA, European Union, France, Germany, Global, Italy, Japan
  • October 22 2015

Economic and trade sanctions have become a favoured geopolitical tool of governments. The rules are complex, ever evolving, and the violation risks


Global Employment Law - What's New? Spring 2016
  • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
  • Belgium, European Union, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, USA
  • April 27 2016

While the European Commission is working towards issuing guidelines on how to apply existing EU legislation to the sharing economy, several countries


Global: What's on the horizon in 2016
  • DLA Piper LLP
  • Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, United Kingdom, USA, Venezuela, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Arab Emirates, Indonesia, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Denmark, European Union, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India
  • December 17 2015

In this month's edition of Be Global, we bring you a summary of the most significant international employment law developments from the the past 12


Corporate criminal liability - April 2016
  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • Spain, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, USA, OECD, Poland, Romania, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Czech Republic, European Union, France, Germany, Global, Hong Kong, Asia-Pacific, Australia, Belgium, China
  • April 26 2016

The survey looks at whether there is a concept of corporate criminal liability in a number of different jurisdictions. We consider the underlying


Global privacy & cybersecurity update Issue 8 - November 2015
  • Jones Day
  • Australia, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, USA, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Peru, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, European Union, France
  • November 16 2015

In July, President Obama appointed Dr. Raymond Cook to the position of Chief Information Officer of the Intelligence Community, Office of the


Recent developments for the second quarter 2012
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom, USA, France, India, Ireland, Israel, Japan, Malaysia, Argentina, Belgium, China, European Union
  • September 10 2012

Summer usually brings a lull in stock plan activity as companies complete the proxy season, say-on-pay votes and plan amendments


“It’s criminal!” The criminalization of antitrust continues across the world
  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • Belgium, European Union, New Zealand, United Kingdom, USA
  • January 20 2014

It is a well-known feature of antitrust (or competition) law in the United States that violations carry criminal penalties, which are borne by