We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 295

Large financial penalties spread to the Antipodes - global trends in AMLCTF enforcement
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia, United Kingdom, USA
  • April 11 2017

Multi-million (and billion) dollar fines for AMLCTF breaches are no longer the preserve of United States and United Kingdom. In this post, we

How much dough are smells worth?: Hasbro files a scent mark in the US
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • USA
  • April 10 2017

Our sense of smell (or ‘olfactation’ as it is technically described) is said to be the sense most intimately linked to our memories. There are certain

Touch the edge - is data “tangible property” for the purpose of your insurance policy
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom, USA
  • March 27 2017

Defining what is and what isn't "tangible property" should be easy. Right? There are a plethora of accepted definitions about tangible property being

Don’t you wanna dance with me? US Supreme Court to hear Amgen v Sandoz biosimilars case
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • USA
  • January 24 2017

The US Supreme Court has granted petitions for certiorari in Amgen v. Sandoz confirming that the Court will examine the operation of the "patent

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • China, USA
  • January 16 2017


A Global Perspective: Do Parallel Imports Constitute Trademark Infringement?
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • China, European Union, Japan, South Korea, USA
  • September 19 2016

The exhaustion of intellectual property rights is a topic of heated debate around the world. The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual

Enforcing against foreign State parties: Some lessons from abroad
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • USA, Australia, China, Hong Kong, United Kingdom
  • September 15 2016

Parties doing business with foreign States should think carefully about the doctrine of state immunity, and how it might limit any rights they hold

Lessons from the GUCCI case: Chinese banks increasingly subject to U.S. jurisdicton
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • China, USA
  • August 29 2016

In 2010 and 2011, the New York branch of the Bank of China ("BOC")was served with two subpoenas relating to a lawsuit for trademark infringement

"No injury" case rejected by Supreme Court - Class actions in the US
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • USA
  • August 26 2016

US Courts have interpreted Article III of the US Constitution as imposing a requirement that, in order to establish standing to bring a claim at

Experience: A Patent Infringement Litigation in China
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • China, USA
  • August 11 2016

The intellectual property rights (IPR) protection of China has become a worldwide hot topic. China, as a manufacturing giant, will inevitably become