We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 171

Second Circuit rules that the FLSA does not bar enforcement of class action waivers: Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • August 16 2013

On August 9, 2013, the Second Circuit ruled that an employee may be compelled to arbitrate individual claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act


AAAICDR introduces optional appellate arbitration rules
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • November 26 2013

Historically, a court can set aside an arbitration award based only on narrow statutory grounds. Over the past few years, a number of arbitral


California Supreme Court holds express class action waivers in employment arbitration agreements are enforceable
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 3 2014

On June 23, 2014, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, No. S204032, 2014 WL 2808963


D.C. Court holds date arbitral award issued is date for appropriate currency conversion
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 3 2013

In today's global economy, it is not uncommon for arbitration awards to be denominated in a currency that is foreign to the place of enforcement. In


First Circuit holds that preclusive effect of prior arbitration outcome is itself an arbitrable issue
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • April 7 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit earlier this year held that the preclusive effect of a prior arbitration is itself a matter for


Massachusetts High Court rules that Federal Arbitration Act applies to contracts involving interstate commerce
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • August 19 2013

In a decision that has implications for reinsurance, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court last week decided that the Federal Arbitration Act


Recent caselaw illuminates the limits of the Federal Arbitration Act’s reach to insurance contracts
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 17 2013

Courts are more and more likely to enforce an arbitration clause, but not necessarily the ones in an insurance contract. The U.S. Supreme Court has


Do I really have to ask?
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • May 29 2014

On May 23, 2014, the Supreme Court of Texas, in Tenaska Energy Inc. v. Ponderosa Pine Energy LLC, 2014 Tex. Lexis 427, reaffirmed the duty of a


The Supreme Court rules that courts must honor an arbitrator’s construction of contractual language in favor of class arbitration, “however good, bad, or ugly”
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 14 2013

In Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter, 569 U.S. ____ (2013), the Supreme Court all but ordered the federal courts to not decide whether one person can


Binding arbitration clauses in insurance policies found unenforceable in Washington
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • February 14 2013

In State of Wash. Dep't of Transp. v. James River Ins. Co., No. 87644-4 (Wash. Jan. 17, 2013), the Washington Supreme Court en banc recently declined