We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 126

SEC weighs in on Intercontinental Regional Center Trust of Chicago (IRCTC)
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • USA
  • February 11 2013

On Wednesday, February 6, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Comission (SEC) brought a civil action alleging a myriad of SEC violations against A


The Dutch Act on Collective Settlement of Mass Claims (WCAM) Goes Global Again: A Forum Outside the United States to Resolve Mass Claims Disputes Internationally
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • Netherlands, USA
  • March 29 2016

On March 14, 2016, Ageas (formerly, Fortis Bank) and several foundations representing the Fortis shareholders announced a EUR 1.204 billion


Eleventh Circuit Raises Important Questions About Challenging the Constitutionality of SEC Administrative Proceedings
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • USA
  • March 10 2016

Two weeks ago, the United States Court of Appeals of the Eleventh Circuit heard oral argument in consolidated appeals by the SEC to overturn two


The door to constitutional challenges against SEC administrative proceedings may have just opened wider in the Northern District of GA
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • USA
  • November 23 2015

Last week, in Ironridge Global IV, Ltd., et al. v. SEC, No. 15-cv-2512, U.S. District Court Judge Leigh Martin May issued her third well-reasoned


The Netherlands as an alternative forum for cross border class settlements and the potential consequences for claims by ‘foreign cubed’ plaintiffs under U.S. securities laws
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • Netherlands, USA
  • January 12 2010

In any litigation, and particularly in disputes regarding mass claims, there are times when various settlement options have to be considered


Best Buy: First Appellate Decision Interpreting and Applying Halliburton II Rejects Class Certification Based Upon the Absence of “Front-End” Price Impact
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • USA
  • April 15 2016

On April 12, 2016, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund v. Best Buy Co., Inc., et al., CV No. 14-3178, became the first


D.C. District Court upholds SEC’s conflict minerals rules, GAO report questions effectiveness on humanitarian efforts
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • USA
  • July 24 2013

On July 23, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia entered summary judgment in favor of the U.S. Securities and Exchange


Supreme Court issues guidance on disclosure of opinions in registration statements
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • USA
  • March 26 2015

In a highly anticipated opinion issued earlier this week in Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund, 575 U.S


Gaining whistleblower protection: engaging in activity protected by Dodd-Frank is not enough
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • USA
  • November 19 2014

Earlier this month, a district court ruled that an employee simply engaging in activity protected by the Dodd-Frank Act's anti-retaliation provision


SEC remains divided over conflict minerals rules; CorpFin issues guidance on compliance
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • USA
  • April 30 2014

On April 29, 2014 Keith F. Higgins, the Director of the Division of Corporation Finance (CorpFin) at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC