We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 3,633

Federal Circuit patent bulletin: Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Elecs. N. Am. Corp.
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • February 21 2014

On February 21, 2014, in Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Elecs. N. Am. Corp., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Rader


Invasion of privacy exclusion in D&O policy bars coverage for alleged TCPA violations
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • February 18 2014

The United States District Court for the Central District of California has held that an invasion of privacy exclusion in a D&O policy barred


Avoid the uncertainty of a jury verdict: prove your quantum using actual costs
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2014

In a recent case before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, RLB Contracting, Inc., ASBCA No. 57638, Jan. 3, 2014, 2014 WL 123639, the Board


Federal Circuit patent bulletin: Frans Nooren Afdichtingssytemen B.V. v. Stopaq Amcorr Inc.
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2014

"It is the usual (though not invariable) rule that, in patent claims as elsewhere, the construction of a clause as a whole requires construction of


Federal Circuit rejects narrow view of the Government’s duty to cooperate
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2014

Like all contracting parties, the Government is bound by an implied duty of good faith and fair dealing in all of its contracts, and contractors


What good is your BPA?
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2014

A recent Federal Circuit decision confirms what most sophisticated contractors already know. While blanket purchase agreements (BPAs) may be useful


Understand the limits of CAS disclosure statement reviews
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2014

The January 16, 2014 Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) decision in the Appeal of Northrop Grumman Corporation, ASBCA No. 57625, 2014


Violations of consumer protection law considered intentional acts that do not constitute a "wrongful act"
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • December 13 2013

The United States District Court for the District of Kansas, applying Arizona law, has held that no coverage is available under an E&O policy for a


Right to independent counsel triggered by possibility of excess judgment, even where insurer did not reserve rights
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • May 13 2014

Applying Illinois law, an Illinois federal district court has held that the "nontrivial possibility" of an excess judgment creates a conflict of


Securities Exclusion may not negate duty to defend where ERISA action alleges conduct outside exclusion’s scope
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2014

The United States District Court for the District of Nevada, applying Nevada law, granted in part and denied in part an insurer's motion to dismiss