We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 95

Agencies issue final rules on Hart Scott Rodino Premerger Notification form
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 14 2011

On July 7, 2011, the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (the “Agencies”), issued extensive changes to the Hart Scott Rodino (“HSR”) Premerger Notification form


Second Circuit affirms Drug Mart v. Am. Home Products Decision, further limiting Robinson-Patman Act liability
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 24 2015

On August 27th, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the Eastern District of New York's decision in Drug Mart Pharmacy Corp. v


Court dismisses ro-ro class action as preempted by Shipping Act
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • August 28 2015

On August 28, 2015, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissed the consolidated class action complaint filed on behalf


FTC announces 2014 revised jurisdictional thresholds for Hart-Scott-Rodino Act filings
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • January 17 2014

The Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") recently announced the annual changes to the jurisdictional thresholds for Section 7A of the Clayton Act. These


Department of Justice successfully challenges BazaarvoicePowerreviews merger
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • January 16 2014

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California determined last week that Bazaarvoice, Inc., a social media marketing company


DOJ settles gun jumping charges with Flakeboard and SierraPine
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • November 19 2014

On November 7, 2014, the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division (DOJ) announced the settlement of charges it brought against


Clorox decision breathes new life into RPA challenges to promotional packaging
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • February 27 2015

In the first reported federal court decision of its kind, the Western District of Wisconsin recently declined to dismiss a case filed by a retail


FERC’s proposed penalties for market manipulation: do they violate the Eighth Amendment prohibition on excessive fines?
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • December 31 2012

In the past year, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") issued over five orders directing various companies and individuals to show cause why


Federal Court ruling calls most-favored-nation clauses into question by deeming Apple’s use of MFNs a per se unlawful violation of the antitrust laws
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 25 2013

In a highly anticipated decision, Judge Cote of the S.D.N.Y. Found that five major book publishers "conspired with each other to eliminate retail


Roro operator pleads guilty to price fixing
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • February 28 2014

The U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division issued a press release on February 27, 2014, announcing that Compañía Sud Americana