We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 260

McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games America, No. 2015-1080 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 13, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 21 2016

Method claims reciting specific means or improvements to the art are patentable, while method claims directed to abstract results or effects using


Dey, L.P. et al. v. Sunovion Pharm., Inc., No. 2012-1428 (Fed. Cir. May 20, 2013).
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 30 2013

Clinical drug trials operating under standard confidentiality procedures do not constitute a third-party public use under pre-America Invents Act


The Ohio Willow Wood Co. v. Alps South, LLC, Nos. 2012-1642, 2013-1024 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 15, 2013)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • November 20 2013

In an equitable conduct assertion, an argument of lack of corroboration of testimony for invalidation of a patent is evaluated for materiality under


SkinMedica, Inc. v. Histrogen Inc., No. 2012-1560 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 23, 2013)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 4 2013

Patent prosecution history and specification were held to implicitly redefine the terms of a claim


University of Utah v. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung der Wissenschaften E.V., Case No. 2012-1540, -1541, -1661 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 19, 2013)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 4 2013

The Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction over a suit to correct inventorship between a State University and officials from another State


Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. Buyers Product Company, 2011-1291, 2012-1046, -1057, -1087, -1088 (Fed. Cir. May 21, 2013).
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 30 2013

Patentee's profit in the face of infringement does not prevent permanent injunction; "25 rule of thumb" and profit-margin ceilings for royalties


Nuance Communications Inc. v. Abbyy Software House
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • November 16 2010

A foreign defendant is subject to specific personal jurisdiction when it imports and controls the distribution of allegedly infringing products into the forum


Hyatt v. Kappos
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • November 16 2010

In a civil action brought pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 145, new evidence is generally admissible, and the issues that it raises must be reviewed de novo


Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • November 16 2010

The Federal Circuit en banc hears oral argument regarding the standard for inequitable conduct - "but for" standard versus "all information material to patentability."


Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. v. Navinta LLC
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • November 16 2010

To establish Article III standing, a plaintiff must demonstrate that it holds an enforceable title to the patent at the inception of an infringement action, and jurisdictional defects cannot be cured after the complaint has been filed