We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 195

Forest, environmental groups weigh in on biomass appeal
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 26 2013

Forest industry groups filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on August 19 to extend the appeals


Coal ash property damage ruling released
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 26 2013

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit determined in an August 20 ruling that residents neighboring a Pennsylvania coal-fired power plant


Justices Spar over pre-emption as High Court allows state law antitrust claims to proceed against interstate pipelines
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • April 27 2015

On April 21, 2015, in a 7-2 decision authored by Justice Breyer, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that state law antitrust claims brought against


NY appeals court to consider fracking bans
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • September 3 2013

In an August 29 announcement, the New York Court of Appeals said it would consider two fracking ban cases. Two lower courts had previously upheld the


Vogtle plant case
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • December 2 2012

Nine environmental and public interests groups seeking to require stronger safety standards for new nuclear power plants faced considerable skepticism from a three-judge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia November 19 regarding the merit and timing of their petitions


Washington outlook for 2014
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • Taiwan, USA, Vietnam
  • January 13 2014

As Congress returns this month, ML Strategies is pleased to continue our tradition of offering an Outlook for the coming year. This year, in addition


OK court allows Keystone construction
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 12 2012

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma rejected a motion August 5 by the Sierra Club to block segments of TransCanada’s Keystone XL oil pipeline, holding that the environmental group did not establish a likelihood of success on the merits of the case


Challenge to CO2 rule
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 12 2012

The Environmental Protection Agency filed an August 9 motion with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit requesting that the court dismiss challenges to the agency’s proposed carbon dioxide performance standards for new power plants


Ks utilities entitled to nuclear storage costs
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • July 15 2012

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled July 12 that three Kansas utilities that together own the Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station near Burlington, Kansas, correctly apportioned their overhead costs for constructing spent fuel storage facilities and are therefore entitled to receive such costs from the federal government


VT nuke block attempt didn’t exhaust admin remedies
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • July 1 2012

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled June 26 that Vermont cannot block a 20-year license renewal for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station on the basis of a Clean Water Act procedural requirement after the state failed to exhaust its administrative remedies at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission