We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 199

Power plant construction ruling
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • April 1 2013

On March 28, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) can challenge power plant


Washington outlook for 2014
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • Taiwan, USA, Vietnam
  • January 13 2014

As Congress returns this month, ML Strategies is pleased to continue our tradition of offering an Outlook for the coming year. This year, in addition


ND haze implementation plan reconsideration
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • September 30 2013

In a September 23 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to reconsider part of its haze


Order 1000 brief filed
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • September 30 2013

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission filed a brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit September 25, defending


MATS rule finalization
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • October 28 2012

White Stallion Energy Center, Sunflower Electric Power Corp., Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc., Power4Georgians LLC, Deseret Power Electric Cooperative, and Tenaska Trailblazer Partners LLC asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit October 19 to set a deadline by which the Environmental Protection Agency must finalize a rule reconsidering the mercury and air toxics standards for new power plants


Paper mill emissions factors revisions sought
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • December 2 2012

The American Forest & Paper Association and American Wood Council sued the Environmental Protection Agency in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit November 16, contending that the agency’s emissions factors for its greenhouse gas reporting requirements for paper mills and biomass-fired boilers exceed overstate actual emissions and should be revised


Vogtle plant case
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • December 2 2012

Nine environmental and public interests groups seeking to require stronger safety standards for new nuclear power plants faced considerable skepticism from a three-judge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia November 19 regarding the merit and timing of their petitions


A123 files Chapter 11
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • October 21 2012

Electric vehicle battery manufacturer A123, which received a $249 million stimulus grant from the Department of Energy, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection October 15 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to facilitate an agreement in which Johnson Controls will purchase its automotive business assets for $125 million


Offshore wind lease sale announced
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • July 22 2013

The Friends of the Earth filed a suit against the Department of State in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on July 16, saying the


Mercury standards reconsideration progress
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • October 21 2012

The Environmental Protection Agency submitted a status report to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit October 12 showing that it has made significant progress on a proposed rule to reconsider mercury and air toxics standards for new power plants