We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 656

Understand Your District Court Before Going to the PTAB
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 27 2017

A PTAB proceeding, such as an Inter Partes Review ("IPR"), Covered Business Method Review ("CBM") or Post-Grant Review ("PGR") is a powerful


Patent Cases Up Significantly in the Northern District of Illinois
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 24 2017

While the rest of the country saw a year-over-year drop in patent cases during 2016, the Northern District saw an increase. According to the


Court Stays Case Pending IPR & CBM Petitions, Pre-Institution
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 22 2017

T-Rex Prop. AB v. Adaptive Micro Sys., LLC, No. 16 C 5667, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Jan. 26, 2017) (Kendall, J.). Judge Kendall granted defendant Adaptive


Fiduciary Shield Doctrine Does Not Prevent Suit Against Companies Sole Owner Manager
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 20 2017

Judge Shah denied individual defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in this Lanham Act


Northern District of Illinois has Highest PTAB Grant Rate
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 17 2017

The Northern District has the highest grant rate for stays pending Inter Partes Review ("IPR"), Covered Business Method Review ("CBM") and Post-Grant


Letter and Litigation Threat Alone Do Not Create Trademark Actual Controversy
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 15 2017

Judge Bucklo granted declaratory judgment defendant HBI’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ (collectively “Republic Tobacco”


November 2016 Retail Patent Litigation Report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • February 9 2017

November filings slowed a bit from the September October pace. Frequent filers included Grecia, Hawk Technology, Pherah, Phoenix Licensing and


Alice Dismissal, Without Move, is Not Necessarily Exceptional
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • February 3 2017

O2 Media, LLC v. Narrative Science Inc., No. 15 C 5129, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Jan. 3, 2017) (Tharp, J.). Judge Tharp denied defendant Narrative


One Plaintiff’s Copyright Claim Creates Supplemental Jurisdiction Over Other Plaintiff’s State Law Claim
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • February 1 2017

Judge Kennelly denied in part defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) motion to dismiss plaintiff’s state law claims in this case involving copyright claims


October 2016 Retail Patent Litigation Report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • January 31 2017

October continued the summer fall trend of relatively active NPEs into the fall. Frequent filers included Anuwave, Bartonfalls, BillingNetwork