We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 595

December 2015 Retail Patent Litigation Report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 15 2016

NPE filings fell off their incredible November pace once the Federal Rules amendments were implemented as expected, but remained brisk for the


October 2015 Retail Patent Litigation Report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 15 2016

NPE filings began to increase in October, as they usually do in the beginning of Q4. Frequent filers included Hawk Technology, Reflection Code


November 2015 Retail Patent Litigation Report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 8 2016

NPE filings increased sharply in November ahead of the implementation of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure amendments which became effective


September 2015 Retail Patent Litigation Report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 8 2016

The NPEs continued their Patent litigation continued their late summer vacation in September with repeat filings from Hawk Technology, Rothschild


August 2015 Retail Patent Litigation Reports
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 1 2016

As usual in August, the NPEs took some vacation time. Filings were down although frequent filers Hawk Technology, Rothschild and Shipping & Transit


No Reasonable Construction Would Save Plaintiff’s Patent Infringement Claims
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2016

Judge Darrah granted defendants’ motion to dismiss defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff Nalco’s Third Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P


Counterfeit Sales Warrant Statutory Damages, Permanent Injunction and Attorney’s Fees
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • February 22 2016

Judge Coleman granted in part plaintiff Bulgari’s motion for summary judgment of trademark infringement, a permanent injunction and its attorney’s


Design Patent Functionality Decision is a Question of Law
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • February 19 2016

Judge Darrah denied defendants’ (collectively “SharkNinja”) motion for reconsideration of the Court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment of


Failure to Provide Courtesy Copies of Complaints Leads to Sanctions
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • February 17 2016

Xerox Corp. v. Wildcat Licensing LLC, No. 15 C 9424, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Nov. 13, 2015) (Shadur, Sen. J.). Judge Shadur sua sponte fined plaintiff


Weak Factual Basis Enough to Avoid Rule 11 Sanctions
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • February 15 2016

Great Eastern Entertainment Co. v. Naeemi, No. 14 C 4731, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Nov. 5, 2015) (Leinenweber, Sen. J.). Judge Leinenweber denied