We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 302

Lawsuit challenging national organic program guidance on pesticides to continue
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • October 2 2015

A California federal court has denied the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA's) motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by environmental


APHIS seeks comments on environmental assessment of GE moth
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 29 2014

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) seeks public comments on its environmental assessment of the


Class action stayed and Prop. 65 action settled in Pepsi 4-MEI disputes
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • September 25 2015

A California state court has approved the settlement agreement in a lawsuit brought by the Center for Environmental Health (CEH) alleging that


Recent agreements to settle disputes: contaminated GE rice lawsuits, dairy pricing and false pet food ads
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 15 2011

Bayer CropScience has agreed to pay up to $750 million to settle the claims of rice farmers who allege that the company’s genetically engineered (GE) rice contaminated their conventional crops and led to market losses when some countries closed their borders to U.S


Attorney chastised in contaminated GE rice litigation
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2011

A federal judge in Missouri has reprimanded a plaintiffs’ attorney involved in the genetically engineered (GE) rice multidistrict litigation for sending “false and misleading” letters about a recent settlement with Bayer CropScience “to landlords who were either unrepresented or who were represented by other counsel.”


Industry takes aim at draft UCSF report on nanomaterial regulation in California
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • September 10 2010

Concerned about regulatory coordination issues, the omission of new environmental data and an apparent failure to recognize collaborative stakeholder efforts, nanotech industry interests have reportedly urged CalEPA's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and researchers with the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) to revise a draft April 2010 report on nanomaterial regulation


OEHHA Takes Emergency Measure on Prop. 65 Warnings for BPA Exposure
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • March 18 2016

The California Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has proposed an emergency action to


Environmental Groups Seek to Intervene on Seafood Traceability Rule Lawsuit
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • March 17 2017

Three environmental and conservation advocacy groups have moved to intervene in a lawsuit filed by a group of seafood processing, distribution and


Advocacy group seeks ban on use of apple pesticide
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • April 25 2014

The Environmental Working Group (EWG) has requested that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) halt the use of a "post-harvest growth


CalEPA launches new effort to list styrene under Prop. 65
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • March 6 2015

The California Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has announced its intent to list styrene as