We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 158

Yet another court weighs in on FRAND rates (this time for Wi-Fi)
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 31 2013

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, after a bench trial limited to the issue of determining a FRAND rate for licensing a


“Providing . . . Information” to Medical Providers Is Not Given Patentable Weight
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 5 2016

Addressing the application of the "printed matter" doctrine, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) determined that claim elements directed


Data transaction claim not patent eligible
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 31 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a ruling designated as non-precedential, affirmed the district court finding that a claimed


Data-encryption is patent eligible despite not being tied to a particular machine
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 31 2014

Addressing an argument that a data-encryption patent was directed to non-eligible subject matter because it covered an abstract idea divorced from a


Federal Circuit affirms jury verdict of invalidity based on on-sale bar and public use
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 28 2012

Affirming the district court’s judgment, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit cleared Facebook of allegations of patent infringement, finding that that the patent in suit was invalid under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) because the patentee’s product which embodied the patented subject matter was on sale and in public use more than one year before the filing of the patent


New complaint filed by Furuno names Honeywell and Skyforce as proposed respondents
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 4 2011

The ITC received a new complaint on September 30, 2011 filed on behalf of Furuno Electric Co. Ltd. and Furuno USA Inc


Infringement of a computerized method must demonstrate use of a computer
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 7 2010

In a decision that issued shortly before the Supreme Court decision in In re Bilski, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that a patent directed to “computerized method” was not infringed where at least one step was not performed by a computer


Supreme Court affirms clear and convincing standard of patent invalidity proof
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2011

Delivering what is likely the final blow to its battle against a $240 million infringement judgment, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously rejected Microsoft’s plea to modify the clear and convincing evidence standard of proof required to invalidate a patent


Commission grants consent motion to terminate Inv. No. 337-TA-685
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 8 2011

On July 7, 2011, the Commission granted a consent motion filed by complainant, Samsung Electronics Co. (“Samsung”) in Inv. No. 337-TA-685, Certain Flash Memory and Products Containing Same, to terminate the investigation in its entirety on the basis of settlement


Commission issues opinion granting LEO and cease and desist order in Inv. No. 337-TA-661
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 10 2010

The Commission has issued an opinion affirming ALJ Essex’s finding that a Section 337 violation occurred, and provided further findings on invalidity, in Inv. No. 337-TA-661, Certain Semiconductor Chips Having Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory Controllers And Products Containing Same