We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 171

Section 101: Protecting Software & Other Technologies
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 23 2017

Section 101 of the patent statute provides a fundamental threshold for the types of inventions that can be patented. In this episode, McDermott IP


Mixed Results: Federal Circuit’s Intervening 101 Determination Faces PTAB Dissent
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 27 2017

After the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressed the very same issue and patent, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) reached a


Limits on the use of the disclosure-dedication rule under doctrine of equivalents
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 29 2012

Addressing for the first time the issue of whether the disclosure of subject matter in a document incorporated by reference amounts to a dedication of that subject matter to the public under the Johnson & Johnston disclosure-dedication rule, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a district court’s summary judgment of non-infringement, holding that the host patent must first sufficiently inform one of ordinary skill that the incorporated document contains subject matter that is an alternative to a claim limitation before the dedication rule can be used to limit equivalents


Previously Denied Section 101 Defense Rendered Meritorious by the Supreme Court’s Alice Decision
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 25 2016

Addressing a summary judgment of patent ineligibility, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed with the district court that the


Federal Circuit upholds ITC interpretation of 337 to cover induced infringement
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 17 2015

Suprema, IncBy way of background, appellee Suprema manufactures hardware for scanning fingerprints. The scanners must be connected to a computer


No CBM Carve Out for Graphical User Interfaces
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 28 2016

Addressing the scope of covered business method (CBM) patent review and clarifying the application of the "real party in interest" in joint defense


The law of software subject-matter eligibility remains unsettled
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 31 2013

Revisiting the issue of patent subject-matter eligibility in software patents, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower


On a plain and ordinary meaning of “embedded” code in a web page
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 30 2014

Addressing a district court’s construction of the claim term “embedded” code as code “written into the HTML code of the web page” and the related


Indemnity agreement does not equate to a “real party in interest” to create time-bar for inter partes review
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 30 2014

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB, the Board) has concluded that an inter partes review of a patent is not time-barred if a petition was filed


Data-encryption is patent eligible despite not being tied to a particular machine
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 31 2014

Addressing an argument that a data-encryption patent was directed to non-eligible subject matter because it covered an abstract idea divorced from a