We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 117

CBM that recites scanning receipts, encrypting the data and transmitting not patent-eligible
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

Addressing the subject-matter eligibility of a business-method patent for scanning receipts, encrypting the data, and then transmitting it to a cloud


Conventional use of computer not enough to overcome Alice
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 30 2015

In two separate decisions involving an 101 analysis of subject-matter eligibility of business methods patents (CBMs), the U.S. Patent and Trademark


First patents survive inter partes review fully intact
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 29 2014

In the past several months, decisions have been rendered in the first wave of inter partes reviews filed under the American Invents Act (AIA). The


An accused device is “modified” by the installation of software
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 5 2014

Revisiting the wording of claims that recite a combination of hardware and software, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a


What constitutes a covered business method patent?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2015

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) provided guidance as to what constitutes a patent subject to


Data-encryption is patent eligible despite not being tied to a particular machine
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 31 2014

Addressing an argument that a data-encryption patent was directed to non-eligible subject matter because it covered an abstract idea divorced from a


Alice strikes again!
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

Addressing the issue of patent eligibility under 101, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of a


Stays of litigation warranted even when the CBM review does not address all asserted claims or all invalidity defenses
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • December 30 2014

Addressing the denial of a stay pending the covered business method (CBM) review of some, but not all, asserted claims in a district court action, the


Standing requires articulation of jurisdictional facts
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • December 30 2014

Addressing a petition for a covered business method (CBM) patent review, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or


First application of Alice Corp. decision to covered business method patent review
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 8 2014

In determining whether a Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review should be instituted, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) referred to the