We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 553

Evolving Post-Alice Law on Patent Eligibility
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 29 2016

In two recent cases addressing patent eligibility of software patent claims, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found the challenged


Termination of Distribution Agreement Does Not Affect Licenses to Cloud-Based Access
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 29 2016

After finding that a copyright infringement question analyzed by the district court was more properly a contract interpretation issue, the US Court of


Revised Uniform Unclaimed Property Act Finalized for State EnactmentLegislative Drafting Notes and Interpretative Comments Added
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 18 2016

The fourth iteration of a uniform unclaimed property actentitled the Revised Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (RUUPA or Act)has been finalized


OCR Guidance Underscores Importance of Authentication under HIPAA
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 17 2016

In its tenth OCR Cyber Awareness Newsletter of the year (Newsletter), the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) reminded HIPAA-covered entities and business


OCR Explains How Information Blocking Violates HIPAA
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 26 2016

The US Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights recently posted guidance clarifying that a business associate such as


A GUI Situation for CBM
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 28 2016

Addressing the issue of subject matter eligibility for Covered Business Method (CBM) patent jurisdiction under 18(d)(1) of the America Invents


CBM Review Denied for Technological Invention Directed to Financial Product
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 28 2016

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) may deny Covered Business Method (CBM) review if the challenged patent is for a technological


Incomplete Preemption Does Not Result in Patent-Eligible Subject Matter
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 28 2016

In a Final Written Decision of a Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) found the challenged


Post-Grant Review May Be Used to Invalidate Patents Directed to Patent-Ineligible Subject Matter
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 28 2016

Addressing patent-eligible subject matter issues, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) issued a Final Written Decision in a post-grant


Evolving Patent Eligibility Standard for Computer-Implemented Inventions
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 23 2016

While addressing the patent eligibility of computer-implemented inventions, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that under step