We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,154

Ohio appellate court upholds waiver of claims clauses
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • May 25 2016

An Ohio appellate court recently held that by failing to comply with contractual notice requirements, a contractor waived its right to bring claims


Construction insurance fundamentals
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • November 2 2012

"The Heiles argue that the policy exclusions relied on by State Auto do not apply here."


United States House of Representatives v. Burwell: An uncertain future for cost-sharing subsidies
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • May 17 2016

On May 12, 2016, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued a decision in United States House of Representatives v. Burwell


The AIA document B101-2007 Owner-Architect Agreement - who has rights to the instruments of service?
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • February 29 2008

An architect is an artist


“Time is of the essence” finishing the work on time and what happens if the work is not finished on time
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • March 31 2008

The phrase “time is of the essence” can be found in most construction contracts today, but what does it mean?


Contractors pay high penalties for prevailing wage violations
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • May 7 2010

Prevailing wage is required on most Federal and Ohio construction projects


Standard one-year warranty: fact or fiction?
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • April 30 2008

It is often heard from contractors, as well as owners, that “a contractor is not responsible for repairing work on a project outside of a year after the work is complete,” because the project is no longer covered by the contractor’s “standard one-year warranty.”


Nike faces class action over outlet store “discounts”
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • April 25 2016

A $200 shoe on sale for only $100? Nike Outlet discounts can seem too good to pass up. A class action filed in Portland, Oregon, claims that Nike


Lesson of Pippins v. KPMG: “chutzpah” can be costly, especially in large cases before the Southern District of New York
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • March 14 2012

With Pippins v. KPMG, the Southern District of New York, which gave us the Zubulake and Pension Committee decisions, maintains and extends its forward position among jurisdictions nationally in punishing large corporations with broad and expensive preservation requirements


Civil Rule 10(d)(2): an affidavit is required, but merit is entirely optional
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • June 2 2011

The Affidavit of Merit requirement in Rule 10(D)(2) was introduced in 2005 to eliminate frivolous lawsuits