We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,026

The AIA document B101-2007 Owner-Architect Agreement - who has rights to the instruments of service?
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • February 29 2008

An architect is an artist


Construction insurance fundamentals
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • November 2 2012

"The Heiles argue that the policy exclusions relied on by State Auto do not apply here."


“Time is of the essence” finishing the work on time and what happens if the work is not finished on time
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • March 31 2008

The phrase “time is of the essence” can be found in most construction contracts today, but what does it mean?


Contractors pay high penalties for prevailing wage violations
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • May 7 2010

Prevailing wage is required on most Federal and Ohio construction projects


Court upholds double damages and punitive damages for USERRA violation
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • March 26 2008

The federal Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) protects the employment rights and benefits of military service members on their return from military duty


Standard one-year warranty: fact or fiction?
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • April 30 2008

It is often heard from contractors, as well as owners, that “a contractor is not responsible for repairing work on a project outside of a year after the work is complete,” because the project is no longer covered by the contractor’s “standard one-year warranty.”


Civil Rule 10(d)(2): an affidavit is required, but merit is entirely optional
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • June 2 2011

The Affidavit of Merit requirement in Rule 10(D)(2) was introduced in 2005 to eliminate frivolous lawsuits


New life for the death knell? SCOTUS accepts Microsoft Corp. v. Baker
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • April 21 2016

On January 15, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the decision of the Ninth Circuit in Baker v. Microsoft Corporation, 797 F


Parties in private lawsuit have no right to discover redacted confidential medical records of non-parties
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • July 10 2009

On July 1, 2009, the Ohio Supreme Court decided Roe v. Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region, Slip Opinion No. 2009-Ohio-2973


Sixth Circuit appellate court holds that Main Street Acquisition Corp. did not violate the FDCPA
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2014

Late last month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted summary judgment in a case involving a debt collection action under the Fair