We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,088

Public records for private collegeuniversity law enforcement: what’s next?
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • August 24 2015

Earlier this summer, the Ohio Supreme Court decided the case of State ex rel. Schiffbauer v. Banaszak and determined that where a private


Ohio Supreme Court rules on tax commissioner’s role in correcting errors for NOL credit against the CAT; remands case to BTA to determine whether any error existed
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • August 20 2015

On August 19, 2015, the Ohio Supreme Court decided that the tax commissioner may correct errors for net operating losses (NOL) credit against the


Construction insurance fundamentals
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • November 2 2012

"The Heiles argue that the policy exclusions relied on by State Auto do not apply here."


Ohio Supreme Court rules presumption of correctness does not apply on appeal from decision of municipal board of tax review
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • August 21 2015

The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that on an appeal from a municipal board of tax review to the Ohio board of tax appeals (BTA), there is no


The AIA document B101-2007 Owner-Architect Agreement - who has rights to the instruments of service?
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • February 29 2008

An architect is an artist


Standard one-year warranty: fact or fiction?
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • April 30 2008

It is often heard from contractors, as well as owners, that “a contractor is not responsible for repairing work on a project outside of a year after the work is complete,” because the project is no longer covered by the contractor’s “standard one-year warranty.”


Sixth Circuit: using the word “settlement” could create FDCPA liability
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • January 14 2015

In-depth Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) decisions are relatively rare many of the cases either get dismissed on procedural


Judge rules UBS unsuited due to unclean hands
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • August 12 2015

Litigators often come across the "unclean hands" defense in an attempt to dismiss a case due to the plaintiff's unethical behavior relating to the


“Time is of the essence” finishing the work on time and what happens if the work is not finished on time
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • March 31 2008

The phrase “time is of the essence” can be found in most construction contracts today, but what does it mean?


Civil Rule 10(d)(2): an affidavit is required, but merit is entirely optional
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • June 2 2011

The Affidavit of Merit requirement in Rule 10(D)(2) was introduced in 2005 to eliminate frivolous lawsuits