We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 170

Health care providers take note: your contract with an HMO may require affirmative action compliance, even if it doesn’t say so
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • April 10 2013

On March 30, 2013, the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, confirmed that contracting with an HMO to provide medical services to federal


Ohio Supreme Court rules on workers' compensation coverage of mental health conditions
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • June 6 2013

On June 4, 2013, the Ohio Supreme Court found that mental health conditions are covered under Ohio workers' compensation law only when they are


U.S. Supreme Court issues ruling on NLRB recess appointments
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • June 27 2014

On June 26, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling invalidating three recess appointments made by President Obama in 2012 to the National


Ohio’s law prohibiting recognition of same-sex marriages declared unconstitutional
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • April 8 2014

In a decision that will have far-reaching implications for Ohio employers, a federal judge in Ohio said he will issue a ruling declaring


Ohio BWC appeals $860 million premium overcharge verdict to Supreme Court
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • July 1 2014

The Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation (BWC) announced it will ask the Supreme Court to hear its appeal in San Allen v. Buehrer, a class action law


Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk: FLSA collective action may be mooted by full offer of judgment
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • April 18 2013

Tuesday, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk, No. 11-1059. In a 5-4 decision, Justice Thomas wrote for a


Confidentiality of internal investigations revisited
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • May 6 2013

The National Labor Relations Board's Division of Advice recently reviewed an employer's work rule regarding confidentiality of investigations under


Ninth Circuit finds employee statutory claims cannot be removed under CAFA
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • March 21 2014

The Ninth Circuit ruled that a would-be class action for alleged violations of the California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) by an employer


Federal court holds that a physician is considered an “employee” for purposes of the EMTALA whistleblower protection
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • January 31 2014

Recently, a federal court in the Eastern District of Wisconsin held that a physician who has a medical staff appointment and clinical privileges at a


Unilateral implementation of new evaluation policy not an unfair labor practice
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • January 14 2014

The State Employment Relations Board (SERB) has issued a ruling in which it found that a board of education did not commit an unfair labor practice