We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 244

Does posting a LinkedIn status violate a non-solicitation agreement?
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • November 12 2014

A Connecticut company brought suit against a former employee alleging violations of a non-compete agreement and the Connecticut Uniform Trade Secrets


Avoid unintended promises of job security when combating low employee morale
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • March 5 2009

Difficult economic conditions are affecting more and more employers


Criminal background check law upheld against challenge by nonteaching employees
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • March 28 2015

A federal district court in Cincinnati has upheld the 2007 legislation which instituted criminal records checks for all nonteaching school employees


Can a business be liable for misappropriation of trade secrets of its independent contractor?
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • March 30 2015

In a federal court case pending in Illinois, Stevens v. Interactive Financial Advisors, Inc., Case No. 11 C 2223 (N.D. Ill., Feb. 24, 2015) (Kennelly


Employee is fired for disparaging boss on Facebook, NLRB says he engaged in protected activity
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • May 26 2015

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently upheld an administrative judge's finding that firing a union employee who criticized his boss and


FLSA filings on the uptick
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • November 20 2014

A recent federal court case out of New York included data that employers might find interesting. According to Judge Pauley of the Southern District


The truth about the BWC settlement
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • August 26 2014

In late July, the San Allen Inc. v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation case was settled for $420 million. This case involved a large class of


Ohio BWC will pay employers $420 million
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • July 24 2014

An agreement was reached in the lawsuit filed by employers against the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation (BWC) alleging the BWC charged excessive


Could this be you? Business expansion and your BWC experience rating
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • December 11 2014

The Ohio Supreme Court recently issued a decision holding that, following the purchase and transfer of a company's assets, clients, or employees, the


The truth about the BWC settlement
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • August 26 2014

In late July, San Allen Inc. v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation was settled for $420 million. The case involved a large class of private