We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 583

District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss under Section 101 Even Though Two Other District Courts Had Founds Patents Ineligible
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 2 2016

In this patent infringement action, the Defendants filed motions for partial summary judgment of invalidity with respect to two of the patents at


Evidence of Copying Admissible in Patent Infringement Trial to Prove Nonobviousness
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

Metaswitch moved to exclude evidence of copying from a patent infringement action filed against it by Genband. Genband asserted during the pretrial


Defendants' Motion Seeking to Depose Opposing Counsel Denied Where Defendants Could Not Show That Information Was Unavailable from Another Source
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 4 2016

After the plaintiff filed suit against the defendants for patent infringement, the defendants contended that they uncovered during discovery a series


Court finds that Rule 26 disclosure and computation of damages insufficient where party failed to explain how it calculated damage number
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2014

Orbit Irrigation Products ("Orbit") filed a patent infringement action against Sunhills International ("Sunhills"). After the completion of certain


District court strikes "shotgun complaint" that incorporated allegations by reference in each count
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 21 2015

Lanard Toys Limited ("Lanard") filed a patent infringement action against Toys "R" US. Lanard subsequently filed a four-count Amended Complaint and


District Court Strikes Expert Opinion Testimony on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Under Section 101
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 19 2016

Defendants Metaswitch Networks Ltd and Metaswitch Networks Corp. ("Metaswitch") filed a motion to strike plaintiff's expert opinions of Mr. Lanning


Expert Patent Valuation Opinion Based on Forward Citation Analysis Survives Daubert Challenge
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 13 2016

Plaintiff Better Mouse Company's ("Better Mouse") filed a motion to strike portions of the rebuttal expert report and exclude testimony of Richard


District Court Rules Plaintiff Need Not Come Forward with Evidence of Priority Date Earlier than Patent Application Until Defendant Produces Clear and Convincing Evidence of Invalidating Prior Art and Summary Chart Is Not Sufficient
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 26 2016

Omega Patents, LLC ("Omega") filed a patent infringement action against CalAmp Corp. ("CalAmp") asserting that CalAmp infringes the claims of U.S


District court grants motion to dismiss for lack of standing on the eve of trial
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • March 30 2015

Plaintiff Labyrinth Optical Technologies LLC ("Labyrinth") filed a patent infringement action against Defendant Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. ("Lucent"


Motion to withdraw as counsel of record denied because it was filed on the eve of trial
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 19 2014

In this patent infringement action between Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. ("Golden Bridge or GBT") against Apple, Golden Bridge's counsel moved to