We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 614

District Court Strikes Documents That Were Not Produced During Discovery Even Though Documents Were Publically Available
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 18 2016

In this patent infringement action, Mobile Telecommunications Tech., LLC ("MTel") filed against Blackberry Corp., MTel moved to exclude certain


Court Declines to Modify Judgment Based on Collateral Proceedings before the PTAB Finding Claims of Patent-In-Suit Invalid
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 16 2016

In the decision referenced below, the court declined to modify a judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure even


Failure to Institute Inter Partes Review Is Not Grounds for Common Law Estoppel to Prevent Defendant from Re-Litigating Issues Raised before the Patent Office
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 11 2016

The defendant filed a petition for Inter Partes Review ("IPR") with the Patent Office. As part of its application, it submitted a 65 page brief along


Court finds that Rule 26 disclosure and computation of damages insufficient where party failed to explain how it calculated damage number
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2014

Orbit Irrigation Products ("Orbit") filed a patent infringement action against Sunhills International ("Sunhills"). After the completion of certain


Parent company ordered to produce documents in response to request to subsidiary where parent and subsidiary shared servers and databases
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 17 2014

Plaintiff Dri-Steem Corporation ("Dri-Steem") sought production of documents in the possession and control of the defednant's parent company National


District Court Grants Indicative Ruling to Vacate Judgment Based on Settlement of the Parties
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • April 20 2016

In this patent infringement action, the parties reported that they had settled their dispute while it was pending before the Federal Circuit. The


Counterclaims for declaratory judgment for non-infringement and invalidity dismissed as duplicative of infringement complaint and failure to plead any facts describing how the patent was invalid
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 14 2013

Plaintiff, The Sliding Door Company ("Sliding Door"), brought an action for patent infringement against KLS Doors, LLC ("KLS Doors") alleging


Divorces, community property and patents the problem of the ex-spouse
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • December 2 2013

Many universities have standard patent assignment agreements that assign inventions of a university employee to the university. But what if the


Experts Ordered to Produce Draft Reports Exchanged with Other Experts
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 2 2016

In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff, BRP, alleged three counts of patent infringement against Arctic Cat concerning snowmobile frame


Assignment agreements: how to obtain all of the rights to patents in assignment agreements
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • June 17 2013

When drafting assignment agreements, it is important for universities to consider whether, and to what extent, the assignment conveys the right to