We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 631

After Defendant Seeks to Claw Back Attorney-Client Privileged Documents, District Court Determines Privileged Waived (Including Work Product) Because Witness Gave Testimony Regarding Privileged Documents at Deposition
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 21 2016

The defendants produced documents in response to plaintiffs' first set of requests for production and included in the production were five documents


Subsequent Employment Agreement Assigning Inventor's Intellectual Property Rights Does not Defeat Standing for Inventions Created Prior to Employment Agreement
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 14 2016

The plaintiff, Odyssey Wireless ("Odyssey") filed four separate actions for patent infringement against Defendants Apple, Samsung, LG, and Motorola


District Court Orders Production of Bills from Expert Witnesses But Permits Redaction of Narrative Statements in Bills
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 19 2016

In this patent infringement action, the defendant, Ericsson moved to compel the plaintiff, TCL, to produce bills and invoices for worked performed by


Recent Decision in Halo Requires Reconsideration of Summary Judgment Motion on Willfulness
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 12 2016

In a multi-district litigation, the district court had previously granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants on the issue of willful


After Inventor Dies, Patent Infringement Lawsuit Is Dismissed for Lack of Standing on Court's Own Motion
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • June 27 2016

Chris Tavantzis and ChrisTrikes Custom Motorcycles, Inc. ("ChrisTrikes") filed a complaint against a number of individuals and entities that


Court finds that Rule 26 disclosure and computation of damages insufficient where party failed to explain how it calculated damage number
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2014

Orbit Irrigation Products ("Orbit") filed a patent infringement action against Sunhills International ("Sunhills"). After the completion of certain


Divorces, community property and patents the problem of the ex-spouse
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • December 2 2013

Many universities have standard patent assignment agreements that assign inventions of a university employee to the university. But what if the


Parent company ordered to produce documents in response to request to subsidiary where parent and subsidiary shared servers and databases
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 17 2014

Plaintiff Dri-Steem Corporation ("Dri-Steem") sought production of documents in the possession and control of the defednant's parent company National


District Court Permits Survey Evidence to Support Lost Profits Damage Theory
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 7 2016

The defendants', Roland DGA Corporation and Roland DG Corporation (collectively "Roland"), filed a motion for summary judgment against plaintiff


District Court Denies Accounting and Ongoing Royalty Where Jury Instructions Told Jury to Award Damages That Would Put Patent Holder in Same Financial Position Had Infringement Not Occurred
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • December 31 2015

Prism brought suit against Sprint alleging patent infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,127,345 and 8,387,155 (the "Asserted Patents"). After the jury