We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 649

District Court Excludes Damage Expert's Opinion Based On Faulty Royalty Calculation
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2016

In this patent infringement action between Finjan and Sophos, the district court had previously granted a motion to exclude Finjan's damage expert


Plaintiff Granted Dismissal Based on Covenant Not to Sue Even With Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Patentable Subject Matter Pending
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 22 2016

The plaintiff, Shipping and Transit, LLC ("Plaintiff"), filed a patent infringement action against Defendant Neptune Cigars, Inc. ("Defendant"), for


District Court Stays Litigation Pending Inter Partes Review ("IPR") over Defendant's Objection That Summary Judgment Motion Should be Determined First
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 13 2016

After the Patent Trial and Appellate Board ("PTAB") instituted inter partes review ("IPR") of all asserted claims in three of the Patents-in-Suit and


Court grants motion to dismiss for lack of standing where plaintiff merely alleged that it had all substantial rights to patent
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 13 2015

Verify Smart Corp. ("Verify") filed a patent infringement action against Bank of America, N.A. ("BoA"), alleging infringement of United States Patent


District Court Denies Request to Preclude Defendant from Sharing Confidential Information of Plaintiff with PTAB as part of Inter Partes Review
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 15 2016

In this patent infringement action between Ultratec and CaptionCall, CaptionCall filed a motion for relief from the stipulated protective order in


Court finds that Rule 26 disclosure and computation of damages insufficient where party failed to explain how it calculated damage number
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2014

Orbit Irrigation Products ("Orbit") filed a patent infringement action against Sunhills International ("Sunhills"). After the completion of certain


Jury's Finding of Willfulness Sufficient Under Halo to Support Judgment of Willful Infringement
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 28 2016

Sociedad Espanola de Electromedicina Y Calidad, S.A. (Sedecal) filed a patent infringement action against Blue Ridge X-Ray Company, Inc. (Blue Ridge


Parent company ordered to produce documents in response to request to subsidiary where parent and subsidiary shared servers and databases
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 17 2014

Plaintiff Dri-Steem Corporation ("Dri-Steem") sought production of documents in the possession and control of the defednant's parent company National


EON v. Apple: District Court Permits Plaintiff to Present Technology Tutorial Through Expert Consultant Not Previously Designated
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 23 2016

Apple filed an objection to EON's plan to present a technology tutorial through its expert consultant. Apple asserted that the consultant was not


Sprint v. Comcast: District Court Denies Request for Attorney's Fees Pending Appeal to the Federal Circuit
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 30 2016

Plaintiff Sprint Communications Company brought suit against Defendants Comcast Cable Communications, LLC and Comcast IP Phone, LLC alleging