We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 680

District Court Denies Motion to Withdraw Deemed Admissions
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 10 2017

The plaintiff filed an ex parte application to be relieved of admissions that were deemed admitted for failure to respond. In analyzing the ex parte


Court finds that Rule 26 disclosure and computation of damages insufficient where party failed to explain how it calculated damage number
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2014

Orbit Irrigation Products ("Orbit") filed a patent infringement action against Sunhills International ("Sunhills"). After the completion of certain


Parent company ordered to produce documents in response to request to subsidiary where parent and subsidiary shared servers and databases
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 17 2014

Plaintiff Dri-Steem Corporation ("Dri-Steem") sought production of documents in the possession and control of the defednant's parent company National


District court denies motion to lift stay pending inter partes review even where plaintiff agreed to not pursue claims that were subject to review
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 19 2015

Barco filed a patent infringement action in September 2011 against Defendants Eizo Nanao Corporation and Eizo Nanao Technologies, Inc. ("Eizo"


District Court Rules That Claim Construction Requested For First Time During Trial Is Waived
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • December 22 2016

During the trial, the plaintiff, Arthrex, requested that the district court construe the term "proximal end" in certain of the patent-in-suit, U.S


Assignment agreements: how to obtain all of the rights to patents in assignment agreements
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • June 17 2013

When drafting assignment agreements, it is important for universities to consider whether, and to what extent, the assignment conveys the right to


Court grants motion to dismiss for lack of standing where plaintiff merely alleged that it had all substantial rights to patent
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 13 2015

Verify Smart Corp. ("Verify") filed a patent infringement action against Bank of America, N.A. ("BoA"), alleging infringement of United States Patent


Court Grants Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Case or Controversy Even Though Patent Holder Did Not Provide Covenant Not to Sue
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • December 20 2016

Tech Pharmacy filed a patent infringement action against Defendant Alixa Rx LLC and Defendant Golden Gate National Senior Care LLC dba Golden


Applying New Proportionality Requirements, Court Grants Motion to Compel and Orders Production of Unredacted Tax Returns and Financial Statements
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 16 2016

In this patent infringement action, Slide Fire Solutions, LP ("Slide Fire") moved to compel discovery responses from Bump Fire Systems ("Bump Fire"


District Court Denies Accounting and Ongoing Royalty Where Jury Instructions Told Jury to Award Damages That Would Put Patent Holder in Same Financial Position Had Infringement Not Occurred
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • December 31 2015

Prism brought suit against Sprint alleging patent infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,127,345 and 8,387,155 (the "Asserted Patents"). After the jury