We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 641

District Court Denies Apple's Request to Add Acacia into Patent Infringement Lawsuit as Alter Ego of Plaintiff
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 16 2016

In this patent infringement action, Apple filed a motion to add additional Acacia entities as plaintiffs in the action. Apple's primary argue was


Boston University v. Everlight: District Court Grants Immediate Appeal Over Whether Lump-Sum Royalty Award Can Be Converted to Ongoing Royalty Payments Post Verdict
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 18 2016

After a jury awarded the Trustees of Boston University ("BU") a $9.3 million dollar one-time lump-sum payment from Epistar and a $4 million dollar


Court finds that Rule 26 disclosure and computation of damages insufficient where party failed to explain how it calculated damage number
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2014

Orbit Irrigation Products ("Orbit") filed a patent infringement action against Sunhills International ("Sunhills"). After the completion of certain


District Court Denies Request for Production of Documents Provided to Prospective Litigation Funding Organizations
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 10 2016

In this patent infringement action, the defendant sought the production of documents that the plaintif, IOENGINGE, had provided to potential


District Court Grants Motion to Strike Errata Changing Deposition Answers from a "Yes" to a "No"
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 4 2016

In this patent infringement action, the defendants filed a motion to strike an errata change to the deposition testimony of a witness, Joseph Tindall


District Court Excludes Evidence of Lost Profits Where Inventor Did Not Make Products That Practiced the Patent Even Though a Related Corporation Did
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 8 2016

In this patent infringement action, the defendants filed a motion in limine to exclude evidence of any claimed lost profits damages alleged by the


District court strikes "shotgun complaint" that incorporated allegations by reference in each count
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 21 2015

Lanard Toys Limited ("Lanard") filed a patent infringement action against Toys "R" US. Lanard subsequently filed a four-count Amended Complaint and


Russian company served through Texas Secretary of State held proper service because the Russian Federation unilaterally suspended all judicial cooperation with the United States in civil and commercial matters
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • Russia, USA
  • January 23 2013

Blue Spike, LLC ("Blue Spike") filed a patent infringement action against Biolink Solutions LTD. ("Biolink") and Biometric, LLC. Biolink is a Russian


District Court Permits Survey Evidence to Support Lost Profits Damage Theory
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 7 2016

The defendants', Roland DGA Corporation and Roland DG Corporation (collectively "Roland"), filed a motion for summary judgment against plaintiff


Rosebud v. Adobe: district court grants summary judgment of no remedies where plaintiff could not prove actual notice of patent application
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 17 2015

Rosebud filed a patent infringement action Adobe and Adobe moved for summary judgment arguing that Rosebud had no remedy for its patent against Adobe