We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 692

The Impact of TC Heartland: Motion to Challenge Venue Waived Where Defendant Failed to Bring Motion with Other Rule 12(b) Motion
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 13 2017

After this patent infringement action was filed, the defendant, BigCommerce, filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim for relief


Parent company ordered to produce documents in response to request to subsidiary where parent and subsidiary shared servers and databases
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 17 2014

Plaintiff Dri-Steem Corporation ("Dri-Steem") sought production of documents in the possession and control of the defednant's parent company National


Counterclaims for declaratory judgment for non-infringement and invalidity dismissed as duplicative of infringement complaint and failure to plead any facts describing how the patent was invalid
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 14 2013

Plaintiff, The Sliding Door Company ("Sliding Door"), brought an action for patent infringement against KLS Doors, LLC ("KLS Doors") alleging


District court strikes "shotgun complaint" that incorporated allegations by reference in each count
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 21 2015

Lanard Toys Limited ("Lanard") filed a patent infringement action against Toys "R" US. Lanard subsequently filed a four-count Amended Complaint and


District Court Denies Request to Stay Discovery Pending Motion to Dismiss Based on Patent-Ineligible Subject Matter
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • June 8 2016

J. Crew filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' claims for patent infringement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), asserting that


Court finds that Rule 26 disclosure and computation of damages insufficient where party failed to explain how it calculated damage number
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2014

Orbit Irrigation Products ("Orbit") filed a patent infringement action against Sunhills International ("Sunhills"). After the completion of certain


District Court Strikes Affirmative Defenses of Laches, Waiver, Estoppel and Acquiescence for Lack of Sufficient Detail
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • April 18 2016

After the plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint against Fieldpiece Instruments, Inc. ("Defendant") for patent infringement, the Defendant filed


After Defendant Seeks to Claw Back Attorney-Client Privileged Documents, District Court Determines Privileged Waived (Including Work Product) Because Witness Gave Testimony Regarding Privileged Documents at Deposition
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 21 2016

The defendants produced documents in response to plaintiffs' first set of requests for production and included in the production were five documents


District Court Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction Where Inter Partes Review ("IPR") Pending on Claims from Different Patent But Similar to Patent-In-Suit
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • October 14 2016

In earlier patent infringement litigation, the Plaintiff sued Ancestry.com DNA, LLC ("Ancestry") in the District of Delaware ("Delaware litigation"


Divorces, community property and patents the problem of the ex-spouse
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • December 2 2013

Many universities have standard patent assignment agreements that assign inventions of a university employee to the university. But what if the