We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 691

District Court Orders Search of Inventors Emails and Finds That Discovery Is Proportional to Needs of Case Because Search Terms Would Be Used
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • April 26 2017

In this patent infringement action, T-Mobile sought email discovery from seventeen named inventors of the asserted patents and the licensing


Parent company ordered to produce documents in response to request to subsidiary where parent and subsidiary shared servers and databases
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 17 2014

Plaintiff Dri-Steem Corporation ("Dri-Steem") sought production of documents in the possession and control of the defednant's parent company National


District court strikes "shotgun complaint" that incorporated allegations by reference in each count
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 21 2015

Lanard Toys Limited ("Lanard") filed a patent infringement action against Toys "R" US. Lanard subsequently filed a four-count Amended Complaint and


Court finds that Rule 26 disclosure and computation of damages insufficient where party failed to explain how it calculated damage number
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2014

Orbit Irrigation Products ("Orbit") filed a patent infringement action against Sunhills International ("Sunhills"). After the completion of certain


District Court Stays Litigation Pending Inter Partes Review ("IPR") over Defendant's Objection That Summary Judgment Motion Should be Determined First
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 13 2016

After the Patent Trial and Appellate Board ("PTAB") instituted inter partes review ("IPR") of all asserted claims in three of the Patents-in-Suit and


District Court Denies Request to Stay Discovery Pending Motion to Dismiss Based on Patent-Ineligible Subject Matter
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • June 8 2016

J. Crew filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' claims for patent infringement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), asserting that


District court strikes amended infringement contentions and supplemental expert report that were served without leave of court
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 29 2014

Wonderland Nurserygoods Co., Ltd.("Wonderland") filed a patent infringement action against Thorley Industries, LLC, dba 4MOM ("Thorley") for


Counterclaims for declaratory judgment for non-infringement and invalidity dismissed as duplicative of infringement complaint and failure to plead any facts describing how the patent was invalid
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 14 2013

Plaintiff, The Sliding Door Company ("Sliding Door"), brought an action for patent infringement against KLS Doors, LLC ("KLS Doors") alleging


Divorces, community property and patents the problem of the ex-spouse
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • December 2 2013

Many universities have standard patent assignment agreements that assign inventions of a university employee to the university. But what if the


Court orders production of work product documents under crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege where defendants had falsely identified source code
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 20 2015

In an earlier filed decision, the district court had previously found that Escort and its defense counsel had knowingly misled the plaintiff, Fleming