We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 670

District Court Warns Plaintiff That If It Narrows Its Case Too Close to Trial, It Will Have Its Trial Time Reduced
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • November 21 2016

During the pretrial conference, the Plaintiff Arthrex("Arthrex") told the district court that it may be able to narrow its case once the district


District Court Grants Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories Even Though Interrogatories Contained Discrete Subpart Where There was only One Accused Product
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • November 29 2016

Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. ("Synopsys") filed a motion to compel defendant, ATopTech, to respond to interrogatories. ATopTech opposed the motion by


Court finds that Rule 26 disclosure and computation of damages insufficient where party failed to explain how it calculated damage number
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2014

Orbit Irrigation Products ("Orbit") filed a patent infringement action against Sunhills International ("Sunhills"). After the completion of certain


Parent company ordered to produce documents in response to request to subsidiary where parent and subsidiary shared servers and databases
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 17 2014

Plaintiff Dri-Steem Corporation ("Dri-Steem") sought production of documents in the possession and control of the defednant's parent company National


District Court Stays Patent Litigation Pending State Court Proceedings That Will Determine Licensing Issue
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • November 10 2016

In this patent infringement action, MMEI, owns U.S. patent 6,234,099 ("the '099 patent"). Fineline Industries, Inc. ("Fineline Inc.") entered into a


District Court Orders Plaintiff to Produce Factual Support for Infringement Contentions Regardless of Work Product Doctrine
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • November 3 2016

Huawei and Blackberry filed motions to compel seeking the factual material that the plaintiff, SPH, had relied upon to support its infringement


Core Wireless v. LG: District Court Orders Enhanced Damages Based on Defendant's Licensing Discussions
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • November 15 2016

A jury returned a verdict finding that LG infringed the claims of the patent-in-suit and that the claims were not invalid. The jury also found that


District Court Orders Additional Deposition of Defendant after Witness Changed Numerous Deposition Answers in Errata
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • November 23 2016

The plaintiff, Chrimar Systems Inc. and Chrimar ("Chrimar") filed a motion to compel an additional deposition of Defendant D-Link Systems, Inc.'s


District court holds plaintiff and plaintiff's attorneys jointly and severally liable for attorney's fees and costs after finding that attorneys knew of false affidavits filed with the Patent Office
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 22 2015

After trial, HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. ("HTC") filed a motion seeking to recover attorney fees and costs from plaintiff's attorneys as


Russian company served through Texas Secretary of State held proper service because the Russian Federation unilaterally suspended all judicial cooperation with the United States in civil and commercial matters
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • Russia, USA
  • January 23 2013

Blue Spike, LLC ("Blue Spike") filed a patent infringement action against Biolink Solutions LTD. ("Biolink") and Biometric, LLC. Biolink is a Russian