We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 154

Court denies Myriad’s request to enjoin sale of rival BRCA1BRCA2 tests
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • March 20 2014

A federal court in Utah has denied the request for a preliminary injunc- tion filed by Myriad Genetics against a rival company that offered tests


Federal court applies plausibility pleading standard to patent claims
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • March 20 2014

A federal court in Virginia has dismissed with leave to amend the direct patent-infringement claims asserted in litigation involving non-volatile


SCOTUS unanimously rules GM soybean patent infringed
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 16 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court has determined that the "exhaustion doctrine" does not apply in the context of a patented genetically modified (GM) seed, and


Federal Circuit rules on zero damages and standard-essential patents
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 1 2014

In a closely watched case, a divided Federal Circuit Court of Appeals panel has determined that U.S. Circuit Judge Richard Posner, presiding as a


Challenge to AIA first-to-file rule fails for lack of standing
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 17 2014

Ruling that it had jurisdiction to consider a constitutional challenge to the America Invents Act (AIA), the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has


Dissatisfied patent reexamination plaintiff contends standing conferred by statute
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • November 13 2014

A consumer-interest organization that was dissatisfied by a Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) ruling in the appeal of a patent


Jury finds for Heinz in “Dip & Squeeze” packet dispute
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • April 3 2015

A federal jury in Pennsylvania has found that H.J. Heinz Co. did not appropriate the idea of a dual-opening condiment packaging, the "Dip & Squeeze"


ITC initiates imported omega-3 extracts patent-infringement investigation
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • April 25 2013

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has issued a notice regarding its decision to launch an investigation into the amended complaint filed


Court finds no standing for Consumer Watchdog in stem cell patent appeal
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 12 2014

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected not-for-profit Consumer Watchdog's appeal of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's (USPTO's


Soy Fiber Food Additive Too Obvious for Patent, Appeals Court Confirms
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • January 15 2016

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruling that a method of enzymatic hydrolysis of soy