We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 37

Developments in intercarrier compensation
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • September 10 2012

On September 4, 2012, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada’s decision to dismiss Autotel’s complaint concerning an interconnection agreement dispute with Nevada Bell Telephone Company, dba AT&T of Nevada, but remanded the case back to the district court in order to evaluate whether Autotel can lodge a separate claim against AT&T pursuant to Federal Communications Commission regulations


In the courts
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • September 10 2012

On September 4, 2012, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Sprint’s appeal of the Southern District of Iowa’s decision to abstain from hearing Sprint’s challenge to an Iowa Utilities Board ruling that Sprint owed Windstream’s intrastate access charges on VoIP calls


Developments in intercarrier compensation
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • March 4 2013

On February 25, 2013, Comcast Phone of California, LLC filed a motion with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) requesting an order to


In the courts
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • January 14 2013

On January 7, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Windstream Communications could recover a significant


Developments in intercarrier compensation
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • December 26 2011

On December 20, 2011, the South Carolina Public Service Commission issued a scheduling order for AT&T South Carolina’s complaint against Halo Wireless


In the courts
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2012

On June 21, 2012, the Supreme Court vacated the fines levied by the FCC against Fox and ABC for “fleeting expletives” that occurred during live broadcasts


In the courts
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • April 18 2011

On April 12, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit dismissed, for lack of standing, an appeal filed by Tama Broadcasting’s former CEO, Glenn Cherry, challenging the FCC’s denial of his application for review of the decision approving the involuntary assignment of Tama’s broadcast licenses to a receiver


In the courts
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • April 11 2011

On March 29, 2011, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denied a Verizon Wireless motion for judgment on the pleadings in the certified class action seeking relief from the overbilling of its Family Share Plan customers


Developments in intercarrier compensation
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • April 18 2011

On April 7, 2011, Aventure Communications Technology LLC filed a complaint against Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc


In the courts
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • January 28 2013

On January 22, 2013, following a 10-day bench trial, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas agreed with Verizon that its former