We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 237

Overview of and foreign perspective on the Indian insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • India
  • December 21 2016

The Indian Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (Code) introduces a completely new insolvency and resolution regime for India. Key provisions of the


Arbitration in India: a pro-arbitration approach?
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • India
  • December 16 2016

Nick Peacock, Head of the India Disputes practice at Herbert Smith Freehills speaks with Moazzam Khan (Co-head International Dispute Resolution


India and Brazil conclude negotiations of Bilateral Investment Treaty
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Brazil, India
  • December 5 2016

As previously noted in April 2015, India amended its model bilateral investment treaty (the Indian Model BIT) and has reportedly been deploying it in


What is the significance of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership?
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • South Korea, Thailand, Vietnam, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, New Zealand, Philippines, Singapore, Brunei, Cambodia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Australia
  • October 20 2016

Partner Don Robertson explains the significance of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) which is currently being negotiated by 16


India: Amendments to maternity benefit
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • India
  • September 22 2016

Enhancements to maternity benefits in India under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 (the Act) have been in the spotlight for some time. Calls for such


Masala Bonds: Tweaking them into success
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • India
  • August 19 2016

In September last year, the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”) issued guidelines allowing, for the first time, Indian corporates to issue Rupee


Oppression and mismanagement petition dismissed in favour of foreign-seated arbitration
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • India
  • August 8 2016

In Sidharth Gupta and others v Getit Infoservices Private Limited, the Company Law Board, New Delhi Bench dismissed a petition alleging oppression


Delhi High Court refuses to uphold an arbitration clause where the tribunal was composed of one party’s employees
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • India
  • August 8 2016

In Assignia-Vil JV v Rail Vikas Nigam Ltd, Assignia-Vil JV (“Assignia”) had entered into a contract (the “Contract”) to carry out construction works


Indian government to pay damages in the Devas-Antrix BIT arbitration
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • India
  • August 8 2016

A Permanent Court of Arbitration tribunal has found the Indian government responsible for acting “unfairly” and “inequitably” in unilaterally


The Bombay High Court declares copyright infringement claims are arbitrable
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • India
  • August 8 2016

The dispute in Eros International Media Limited v Telemax Links India Pvt Ltd, arose from a term sheet by which Eros had granted to Telemax certain