We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 842

Jó hír a jogtulajdonosoknak: a sportközvetítésben foglalt szerzői jogot egy 8 másodperces videoklip is sértheti
  • Bird & Bird
  • Hungary, United Kingdom
  • April 19 2016

Az Egyesült Királyság legfelsőbb bírósága (“High Court”) egy friss ítéletében kimondta, hogy egy olyan mobiltelefonos applikáció, amely lehetővé


Is predictive coding the route to faster disclosure and reduced costs? - Pyrrho v MWB 2016 EWHC 256 (Ch)
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • April 18 2016

The recent judgment in the case of Pyrrho v MWB 2016 EWHC 256 (Ch) has approved the use of 'predictive coding' in the disclosure process for the


A need for speed? The possible use of expedited dispute resolution procedures in the energy sector
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • April 7 2016

The majority of disputes benefit from being resolved quickly and those arising in the energy sector are no exception. Protracted disputes can be


An eight-second clip can be a substantial part of a broadcastfilm
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • March 24 2016

England and Wales Cricket Board and Sky UK Limited vs Tixdaq Limited and Fanatix Limited - High Court finds that copyright in a broadcast of a


Now that the dust has settled on Trunki, some valuable reminders for designers
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • March 23 2016

The Supreme Court's recent decision in Trunki was unsurprisingly met with uproar in the design community, amid renewed calls for more to be done to


The Supreme Court upholds finding on non-infringement in long running Trunki case
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • March 9 2016

The Supreme Court has today dismissed Magmatic's appeal against the Court of Appeal's finding that its registered Community design ("RCD") was not


Merck kGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & othrs: An example of why the English court system is an efficient neutral forum to resolve disputes between foreign parties
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • March 8 2016

The recent case of Merck kGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & othrs 2016 EWHC49 (Pat) illustrates why the English Court system is a good neutral forum


Court of Appeal reinforces certainty of Part 36 offers; there is no 'near-miss' rule
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • March 4 2016

In a recent short judgment the Court of Appeal has confirmed that Part 36 offers either 'bite' or they are 'beaten'. There is no concept of a


UK: Employment case update on British Gas Trading v Lock, Butterworth v The Police and Crime Commissioners Office for Greater Manchester & Ors and more
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • February 25 2016

The facts of this case will be familiar to those following the story. Mr Lock was employed byBritish Gas Trading (BGT) as an energy trader working


Actavis v Lilly - Judgment on Remission
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • February 19 2016

In the next instalment of the long-running patent action between Actavis and Lilly in relation to the anti-cancer drug pemetrexed, on Friday 12