We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 895

How much can a judge intervene in cross-examination before a trial becomes unfair?
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • May 23 2017

Lord Justice Jackson's reforms to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) enabled judges to take a more active part in case management: they can manage the


Supreme Court judgment in the long-running Lehman Waterfall litigation
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • May 17 2017

On 17 May 2017, the UK Supreme Court handed down judgment in proceedings - commonly known as the Waterfall I litigation - to determine claims with


Modified set-top boxes and copyright infringement - where do we stand?
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom, European Union, Netherlands
  • May 17 2017

In an important decision for rights holders everywhere, on 26 April 2017, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) ruled that the sale of multimedia


The SAP v. Diageo decision - a realistic approach to indirect access?
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • May 17 2017

Following the high court decision in the case of SAP UK Limited (SAP) v. Diageo Great Britain Ltd (Diageo), routine software arrangements many


Sledgehammers on hold
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • May 16 2017

The Valuation Office Agency has amended its practice note on how a property will be assessed for business rates when undergoing refurbishment or


Time off work and religious discrimination
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • April 27 2017

In Gareddu v. London Underground Ltd UKEAT008616, the EAT considered whether it was indirectly discriminatory, on the basis of religion or belief


Medical evidence and dismissals following long term sickness absence
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • April 27 2017

In O'Brien v. Bolton St. Catherine's Academy 2017 EWCA Civ 145, the Court of Appeal agreed with the tribunal's decision at first instance that a


When is harassment not harassment? Guidance from the EAT
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • April 27 2017

In the case of Baker v. Peninsula Business Service Limited 2017 UKEAT024116, the EAT confirmed that an individual cannot succeed in a claim for


Service provision changes: determining the "principal purpose" of an organised grouping of employees
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • April 27 2017

The EAT's decision in Tees Esk and Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust v. Harland and Others 2017 UKEAT017316 provides guidance on how the "principal


Court of Appeal provides further guidance for data controllers on handling subject access requests
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • April 27 2017

In the first April edition of our employment law round-up we considered the Court of Appeal's decision in Dawson-Damer v. Taylor Wessing LLP 2017