We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 944

The rules of interpretation: a seller indemnity in a share purchase agreement
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • July 20 2017

The Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal over the meaning of an indemnity in a share purchase agreement, and in delivering its judgment has given


Removing an arbitrator is an extreme remedy
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • July 20 2017

You might not like an arbitrator's order or an award, but you cannot seek to remove the arbitrator unless their actions have caused or might lead to


Negligence liability: parent and subsidiary companies
  • Dentons
  • Nigeria, United Kingdom
  • July 20 2017

The High Court has considered the circumstances in which a parent company may be liable to third parties in negligence for the acts or omissions of


Disclosure in arbitration: paint the full picture not a vignette
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • July 20 2017

It is relatively hard to establish successful grounds for appealing an arbitration award - and particularly unusual where the appeal is based on the


Oral construction contracts: RCS Contractors Ltd v. Conway, a costly affair indeed
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • July 18 2017

Certainty in a construction contract is all the more important when adjudication is envisaged to have to take place under a demanding timetable. The


Refusing to engage in ADR
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • July 18 2017

The courts have repeatedly held that a failure to engage in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), and in particular mediation, may constitute


Judgments - July 6th 2017 - Disclosure of the identity of third party funders and existence of ATE insurance
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • July 6 2017

In the RBS Rights Issue Litigation (RBS later settled with the relevant action group at the start of the trial period), the High Court set out


Judgments - July 6th 2017 - Clarity provided by the Court of Appeal on the operation of the consent regime in POCA
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • July 6 2017

The Court of Appeal in this case provided further clarity for banks in relation to the money laundering suspicious activity regime contained in the


Judgments - July 6th 2017 - A question of identification - interpreting s393 of FSMA 2000
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • July 6 2017

In March 2017, the Supreme Court overruled a much-publicised 2015 Court of Appeal decision, and determined the proper interpretation of s393 of the


Judgments - July 6th 2017 - Tight controls on the extent of privilege
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • July 6 2017

The High Court has given a strict interpretation on the issue of litigation privilege. The SFO started proceedings against Eurasian Natural Resources