We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,705

US courts and the European Commission further limit “no challenge” clauses in license agreements
  • Baker McKenzie
  • European Union, USA
  • January 28 2014

On January 14, 2013, the US Supreme Court denied a certiorari petition by Rates Technology and let stand the decision of the US Court of Appeals for


Medical devices: new product compliance requirements
  • Baker McKenzie
  • European Union
  • January 24 2014

Recast EU laws on electrical and electronic equipment ("EEE") have complex product compliance ramifications for manufacturers, importers and


European Parliament votes to approve EU Data Protection Regulation and to suspend Safe Harbor
  • Baker McKenzie
  • European Union
  • March 26 2014

On March 12, 2014, the European Parliament voted in a plenary session to fully endorse the revised draft EU Data Protection Regulation (“Regulation”


Impact on EMIR timeline
  • Baker McKenzie
  • European Union
  • November 29 2013

Regulation (EU) No 6482012, known as the European Market Infrastructure Regulation ("EMIR"), came into force on 16 August 2012. However, many of the


UK will support EU free trade negotiations while seeking post-Brexit deals
  • Baker McKenzie
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • October 21 2016

Theresa May has stated that the UK “will continue to back the EU’s free trade negotiations” while it remains in the EU, while also seeking to set the


Membership of “European Union Exit and Trade Committee” Announced
  • Baker McKenzie
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • October 18 2016

The UK Government has today announced 12 full time and three part time members of the “European Union Exit and Trade Committee”. The membership of


When technology distorts competition: accidental collusion in e-commerce?
  • Baker McKenzie
  • European Union
  • August 6 2015

In a recent opinion the Advocate General concluded that collusion can arise among competitors in the e-commerce sector simply by one party failing to


Recent updates to the ECB's eligibility criteria for asset-backed securities
  • Baker McKenzie
  • European Union
  • October 28 2014

As outlined in previous Editions of this SCM Briefing, the European Central Bank (ECB) has over the last few years made a substantial series of


Unified Patent Court: UK Government to Continue Preparations to Ratify Unified Patent Court Agreement
  • Baker McKenzie
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • November 29 2016

The UK Government announced yesterday (28 November 2016) that it will continue preparations to ratify the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA) to


Belgian Fairness Tax violates EU law, according to European Commission
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Belgium, European Union
  • February 3 2015

The European Commission is apparently of the opinion that the Belgian Fairness Tax is incompatible with EU law, and more specifically with the EU