We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 3,808

B&B Hardware v. Hargis U.S. Supreme Court declares TTAB findings can have preclusive effect on subsequent federal court decisions
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • March 30 2015

On Tuesday, March 24, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its second decision in substantive trademark law in nearly a decade. B&B Hardware, Inc. v


SCOTUS: no unlimited suspension of the statute of limitations under the False Claims Act; “first-to-file” doctrine does not bar related suits in perpetuity
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 27 2015

In an opinion released May 26, 2015, Kellogg Brown & Roots Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Carter, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held


Another prologue to cybersecurity regulations: controlled unclassified information (“CUI”) what contractors need to know and why they should care
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 27 2015

Government contractors should take note of a proposed new rule that could impose significant new data storage obligations when finalized. The Federal


The Supreme Court upholds the availability of subsidies on the federal exchangewhere do we go from here?
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2015

One of the most highly anticipated decisions of the termat least among the Sheppard Mullin Healthcare teamwas issued today by the Supreme Court:


Baker v. Microsoft Corporation revisited: video gaming company seeks to stop class action plaintiffs from shortcutting the appeals process
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 8 2015

We recently reported on a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals opinion reversing a district court’s decision to strike class action allegations in a


FDA发布低风险常规 健康产品指南
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 9 2015

2015年1月20日美国食品药品监督管理局(“FDA”)发布了指南草案 1旨在指导生产促进健康生活方式的产品和应用所谓的“常规健康 产品”的开发商何时其产品将作为食品药品和化妆品法案“法 案”中第201(h)中规定的医疗器械受制于法案对器械的管理要求


California Court of Appeal refuses to enforce forum selection clause because employer would not stipulate to apply California law and did not show that the foreign state’s legal protections were equal to California’s
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • June 16 2015

In Verdugo v. Alliantgroup, L.P., the California Court of Appeal held that a forum selection clause in an employment agreement was unenforceable


Suspensions and debarments on the rise a brief review of the ISDC’s FY 2014 stats
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • April 30 2015

The upward trend of suspensions and debarments continued in FY 2014. According to the Interagency Suspension and Debarment Committee ("ISDC") Report


When it comes to crop insurance, the FCA bears fruit
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • April 30 2015

The federal crop insurance program is an often overlooked area of potential liability under the False Claims Act (“FCA”). The program, which is


The Second Circuit’s Apple ebooks opinion
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • September 9 2015

The Second Circuit affirmed the district court and held, 2 to 1, that defendant Apple Inc. had violated Section 1 by masterminding the creation