We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 3,275

SCOTUS: no unlimited suspension of the statute of limitations under the False Claims Act; “first-to-file” doctrine does not bar related suits in perpetuity
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 27 2015

In an opinion released May 26, 2015, Kellogg Brown & Roots Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Carter, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held


Another prologue to cybersecurity regulations: controlled unclassified information (“CUI”) what contractors need to know and why they should care
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 27 2015

Government contractors should take note of a proposed new rule that could impose significant new data storage obligations when finalized. The Federal


California Supreme Court makes it harder for prevailing FEHA defendants to recover their costs
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 26 2015

Under section 1032(b) of the California Code of Civil Procedure, “a prevailing party is entitled as a matter of right to recover costs in any action


Second Circuit narrows scope of SLUSA preclusion
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 26 2015

In In re Kingate Management Ltd. Litigation, No. 11-1397, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6725 (2d Cir. Apr. 23, 2015), the United States Court of Appeals for


Delaware Chancery Court holds that creditor plaintiffs in derivative suits may satisfy standing requirement by showing corporation’s insolvency at time of suit, regardless of later solvency
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 26 2015

In Quadrant Structured Products Co., Ltd. v. Vertin, C.A. No. 6990-VCL, 2015 WL 2062115 (Del. Ch. May 4, 2015), the Delaware Court of Chancery held


“‘Say it ain’t so, bro!’” (Episode 14)
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 22 2015

Previously we've discussed Hooli's reverse engineering of Pied Piper's technology and the threatened lawsuit for ownership of the technology. In


Attention D.C. employers: notice provisions of Wage Theft Prevention Amendment Act must be complied with by May 27, 2015
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 21 2015

D.C. employers have until May 27, 2015, to comply with the notice provisions of the Wage Theft Prevention Amendment Act of 2014 ( "WTPAA"), which


What is retaliation in the Second Circuit under the FLSA?
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 21 2015

On April 20, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed a long-standing precedent when it held in Greathouse v


State regulatory scheme offering antitrust immunity to healthcare collaborations creates tension between federal and state antitrust enforcement
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 20 2015

On April 22, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission submitted a public letter to the New York State Department of Health (DOH) expressing "strong


Back to the future should stock incentive plans impose grant limits on non-employee director awards?
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 20 2015

On April 30, 2015, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware rendered an important case decision in a procedural matter dealing with the equity