We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 39

Supreme Court restates that temporary interference with property may cause taking
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • December 9 2012

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court released its unanimous opinion in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States


Supreme Court to hear arguments tomorrow in eminent domain case
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • December 1 2009

The United States Supreme Court will hear arguments tomorrow in the case Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection


New York's highest court upholds Atlantic Yards condemnations
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • November 28 2009

New York’s highest court ruled on Tuesday that private property could be condemned for the "Atlantic Yards" project


Justices appear skeptical of takings claim
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • January 30 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral argument a property owner's claim that the denial of a permit to develop his land constituted an


Supreme Court decides eminent domain case
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • July 5 2010

The US Supreme Court recently handed down a very interesting decision


Conservative group criticizes Trump on eminent domain opinion
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • April 23 2011

The politically conservative group Club for Growth attacked Donald Trump, who is apparently considering a bid for the Republican presidential nomination, for alleged abuse of the power of eminent domain


Kelo author to resign
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • April 11 2010

Justice John Paul Stevens, the author of the controversial "Kelo" decision, has announced that he will retire this decision


Pa court rules that condemnation must be initiated within 1 year of authorization of taking
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • March 12 2011

A Lehigh County Trial Court recently held that an eminent domain action was void ab initio where the condemning authority did not file a declaration of taking within one year of the authorization of taking


Pa court reaffirms that where declaration of taking is filed de facto taking can only be asserted through preliminary objections
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • March 16 2011

A Pennsylvania condemnee has two procedural mechanisms to assert a de facto taking


Pa court confirms that eminent domain claim cannot be asserted in non-eminent domain suit
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • December 30 2010

In Borough of Walnutport v Dennis, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania restated Pennsylvania black letter law that any claim for damages caused by an alleged condemnation must be brought pursuant to the procedures of the Eminent Domain Code